If DRG could have a wyvern and high DPS

[Krausus]

sometimes it seems to me in this dragoon /wyvern discussion... that all lancers want to see them doing XXXXDMG on their own... instead of splitted up with two charas.

well i hate the fact that lancer became so popular since the ifrit videos on youtube. it seems to me they picked the class because its THE damage dealing melee class at the moment.. and thats why they want no wyvern pet

<------> pe*** size


well i will accept both of types now... im looking forward to what SE is doing about the drg job. lets see if its stylish enough without the wyvern... well lets see.

you are wrong been Lancer since beta, in fact this debate has been going on long before the Ifrit fight and even then the majority did not want a wyvern pet

[Tonkra]

Does Colonel Sanders have a pet chicken?

Does Blade have a pet vampire?

no blade is a vampire himself ;D does a hunter in WoW have a pet`? does a beastmaster have a pet? does the warlock have a pet? blablabla*

does it make the hunter or warlock gimped? hell no. on the opposite

you are wrong been Lancer since beta, in fact this debate has been going on long before the Ifrit fight and even then the majority did not want a wyvern pet

because they are afraid that it will be the same like in FF11.. (although i think he was a good dd in FF11). MOST of the people didnt took the wyvern dmg and breath attacks into account (which is stupid imho). it was like a warrior with polearm + wyvern dmg + tactically things like healing breath etc

i would personally prefer both types. because THEN i could kick your asses up in pvp with my "gimpy" wyvern. TWO are better then ONE i would make a hunt on all you non-wyvern drg's ^^

PAH



well im looking forward to that what SE will offer to us DRG players... but i dont think that drg will be more "exciting" than lancer is. it will be almost the same. but well, lets see if they have some "stylish" skills for us.

For me coming from DarkAgeOfCamelot (16 classes per realm - where many are really innovative and new) simple classes are not that exciting to me. a polearm wielding class is nothing special to me. its like "hm ok, saw that before. a polearm footsoldier"

[Krausus]

no blade is a vampire himself ;D does a hunter in WoW have a pet`? does a beastmaster have a pet? does the warlock have a pet? blablabla*

does it make the hunter or warlock gimped? hell no. on the opposite



because they are afraid that it will be the same like in FF11.. (although i think he was a good dd in FF11). MOST of the people didnt took the wyvern dmg and breath attacks into account (which is stupid imho). it was like a warrior with polearm + wyvern dmg + tactically things like healing breath etc

i would personally prefer both types. because THEN i could kick your asses up in pvp with my "gimpy" wyvern. TWO are better then ONE i would make a hunt on all you non-wyvern drg's ^^

PAH



well im looking forward to that what SE will offer to us DRG players... but i dont think that drg will be more "exciting" than lancer is. it will be almost the same. but well, lets see if they have some "stylish" skills for us.

For me coming from DarkAgeOfCamelot (16 classes per realm - where many are really innovative and new) simple classes are not that exciting to me. a polearm wielding class is nothing special to me. its like "hm ok, saw that before. a polearm footsoldier"

nah it will go like this

1. kill Wyvern

2. kill gimped Dragoon

3. /s loldrg!

[Mairuzu]

no blade is a vampire himself ;D does a hunter in WoW have a pet`? does a beastmaster have a pet? does the warlock have a pet? blablabla*

does it make the hunter or warlock gimped? hell no. on the opposite

Yeah blade is a vampire himself just like freya had dragon breath abilities.