WAR Consolidated Feedback Thread

[AdamZ]

I think it was deliberate. I mean, SE constantly pushes us to tank in tanking stance. If you would get Bloodbath back (or anything similar to that), WARs would sit if DPS stance just as they did in 3.x.
I am very happy what they did with Steel Cyclone, it was one of my wishes for a long time, but I agree that HP recovery is somehow lacking these few percent, just like in case Path and IB...

I never understand anyone who says "SE wants tanks in tanking stance". If this is at all true, then WAR design is the most messed up thing they have ever done. It has its abilities locked behind its stances, and has all its dps abilities locked to the dps stance.

[Vejitta]

I never understand anyone who says "SE wants tanks in tanking stance". If this is at all true, then WAR design is the most messed up thing they have ever done. It has its abilities locked behind its stances, and has all its dps abilities locked to the dps stance.

That's exactly why WAR is in such a bad position now and why it was in such good position on 3.x.

[zipzo]

I never understand anyone who says "SE wants tanks in tanking stance". If this is at all true, then WAR design is the most messed up thing they have ever done. It has its abilities locked behind its stances, and has all its dps abilities locked to the dps stance.

I'm not sure what you're saying here. Surely, locking DPS behind the DPS stance would be a surefire way to force tank stance Warriors to focus on tank abilities?

How is their design contradictory to that idea?