[SUGGESTION] Tie PvP Experience to Point Results

[ThirdChild_ZKI]

Then go right ahead and do so, maybe you will improve the experience of those people in the GCs that consistently lose. You will just trade one consistently winning GC out for a different one and the same complaints will keep going, just the GC names will be different.


Seriously, if they want serious pvp then they should just make a damn ranked version and leave the unranked version for those just looking to grind xp. Where win or loss does not affect your xp gains. After all, true pvpers should be competing with each other right? For bragging rights? Then they should do it in a mode where it is tracked and ranked against everyone else also trying to push to prove they are the best.

We call it the Feast. But unfortunately people are trying to grind XP there too.

I should also note that the Feast DOES have an unranked mode, but currently the ranked 4v4 still gives XP, and that should really change before the official 5th season starts. How bad would it sting if you get a teammate - and note, there's nothing but solo queue now for ranked - who doesn't care if they win or lose during one of your promotion matches?

P.S. I think an equally large issue is the rather awful perception that Frontlines isn't serious PvP.

[TankHunter678]

We call it the Feast. But unfortunately people are trying to grind XP there too.

That is... baffling, since match length is supposed to increase the amount of xp one gets.

I actually would not mind xp being removed from feast to give back a place for hardcore pvpers to compete, but that opinion is born from me never feeling like running feast to begin with.