[SUGGESTION] Tie PvP Experience to Point Results

[Sylvina]

Yeeah like PVP needs further nerfs. Anyone notice how the amount of bots skyrocketed AFTER they nerfed the XP for losers? just return it to an equal high amount of XP for all participants and ignore the whiners. You do want people to queue for pvp right SE?

[Shut]

Yeeah like PVP needs further nerfs. Anyone notice how the amount of bots skyrocketed AFTER they nerfed the XP for losers? just return it to an equal high amount of XP for all participants and ignore the whiners. You do want people to queue for pvp right SE?

If you ever think that it would have never skyrocketed without the xp nerf, then you're completely wrong. When a broken system is exploited, more and more will go for it, especially since most people in FF are taking the "muh pvp" meme as fact. ANyone that had pvp'd a lot before know that very well because it already happened: first season of feast when ppl afk'd/botted/threw match, other seasons of feast with cheaters/wintraders.

Those that made bot scripts didn't said: "hey, pvp gives exp for nothing, let's wait for it to be nerfed to promote and sell our shit"

[ThirdChild_ZKI]

Yeeah like PVP needs further nerfs. Anyone notice how the amount of bots skyrocketed AFTER they nerfed the XP for losers? just return it to an equal high amount of XP for all participants and ignore the whiners. You do want people to queue for pvp right SE?

Hi. What do you think we did before XP was given?

PvP WAS a thing before XP and Garo. I said already it was the lifting of GC restrictions that made it more active. . . Give people something they wanted for 2 years and it's hardly a surprise to see activity increase. But it's worth noting it wasn't dead before that. GC imbalances just made matchmaking more difficult. If there's 6 Adders, 4 Flames, and 2 Maelstrom in queue, you're not even gonna get a 24 man match.