Third place should give 0xp. It's the best way to force everybody to make a strong contribution to actually winning, instead of afk'ing and running around solo just because they know the xp will pay off at the end of the match.
come at me![]()
Third place should give 0xp. It's the best way to force everybody to make a strong contribution to actually winning, instead of afk'ing and running around solo just because they know the xp will pay off at the end of the match.
come at me![]()
Last edited by itsoni; 07-04-2017 at 09:53 PM.



Don't need to, you're plainly baiting.
Third place would wind up just being the unfortunate with the AFK in the group, or the guy with the disconnect, or the person who, like you, is intentionally trolling.
Nobody knows you and the fact you credit a loss to 2/3 people means you have 0 clue what you're talking about. Keep going though, I need something to keep my busy until my client is downloaded.


It does feel like a band-aid onto a larger issue, because now you have the roulette of "which team will have the most afk" - since free exp is free exp, it being lowered will doubtfully change much.



The only people getting punished here are the ones that Play legitimatly.. afkers dont care if they can stay afk even more.
ᛞᚨᚢᛃᛁᚦ ᚠᛖᚺᚢ
ᛞᚨᚢᛃᚨᚾ ᚠᚱᚨᚾᛞᛁᛊ : ᛞᚨᚢᛃᛁᚦ ᛊᛖᛚᛒᚨᛉ ᛊᚨᛗᛟ
ᛖᚲᚨ ᚹᚨᛁᛏ ᚨᚾᚨᛁᚾᛟ
ᚦᚨᛏᚨ ᚾᛖ ᚨᛚᛞᚱᚨᛁᚷᛁᚾ ᛞᚨᚢᛃᛁᚦ
ᛞᛟᛗᚨᛉ ᚢᛗᛒᛁ ᛞᚨᚢᛞᚨᚾᛟ ᚺᚹᚨᚱᛃᚨᚾᛟ



Heh. You're amusing, you know that?
Anyways,
I did not credit the lost to 2/3 people by the way. I was saying 2/3 of the playerbase in frontlines is being punished for the acts of a minority.
Last edited by Hyrist; 07-05-2017 at 02:36 PM.

I personally wouldn't mind this. Worst case scenario for the team that ends up with the most AFK people is that they're back to pre-4.0 pvp where they wouldn't be getting EXP anyways! And perhaps we could theoretically reach a point where this would create enough incentive for all the AFK/leechers to finally start participating.
Hot take: We should give 0 exp for 2nd and 3rd, and 3x exp for first place.
Disclaimer: This isn't the most well-thought out solution and it comes with its own set of problems, but maybe its worth thinking about.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


