Hunts. the tiger and the out of hand early pulling.

[Mandudez]

It's almost like that's the actual definition of an achievement.

Way to avoid the questions.

[Paladinleeds]

Way to avoid the questions.

Fine then, if you want a brutally honest answer. Yes, I do. I think every game should have at least 1 balls against the wall hard achievement that nothing but those with the utmost dedication can achieve.

Hunts are 1st come 1st sr served if lazy enough to wait til some1 looking finds a s rank you dont deserve to participate

I wonder, should it be enforced as that? Let's say you have to "tag" a hunt when you find it. First to tag it gets full rewards, everybody else gets 0? Maybe make it so those in the party (for hunting parties), also get full participation? Just throwing out an idea here before people flame me.

[kattzkitti]

Way to avoid the questions.

[Mandudez]

Another brilliant addition to the discussion.


Hunting is clearly not going away so we should do everything we can to make it as fair and balanced as possible. I don't understand why many people are OK with a large majority of the player base being denied having a reasonable chance to obtain a mount. What is the big deal if a few thousand players get it in 1-2 years compared to maybe 500 ever? This isn't a skill based mount such as the pvp mounts. There was an obvious reason as to why those were limited. There seems to be no real reason as to why the tiger mount is so out of reach other than simply making it a huge time sink in order to lull as many players in as they can in to thinking they can "eventually" obtain it.

[SokiYagami]

Another brilliant addition to the discussion.


Hunting is clearly not going away so we should do everything we can to make it as fair and balanced as possible. I don't understand why many people are OK with a large majority of the player base being denied having a reasonable chance to obtain a mount. What is the big deal if a few thousand players get it in 1-2 years compared to maybe 500 ever?

Rare exclusives.