Results 1 to 10 of 51

Hybrid View

  1. 06-30-2017 03:13 AM #1
    Gravton
    Player
    Gravton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    377
    Character
    Gravton Pentest
    World
    Diabolos
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 80
    So the OP says we need to start blaming the company and is immediately met with criticism from players. Players that not only accept the burden placed upon them by the company but defend it? But in every forum post they always side-step the issue. Why did S/E allow transfers to a server beyond its max capacity? If there weren't log in ques to begin with, AFKers wouldn't be an issue.
    (2)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-30-2017 11:45 AM #2
    DPZ2
    Player
    DPZ2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    2,625
    Character
    Dal S'ta
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 98
    Quote Originally Posted by Gravton View Post
    Why did S/E allow transfers to a server beyond its max capacity? If there weren't log in ques to begin with, AFKers wouldn't be an issue.
    Ummm, prior to the 16th there weren't any servers at "max capacity" (whatever that means). Transfers to high-population servers were suspended weeks earlier, and were expected to remain that way for some weeks after release.

    Personally, I never ran into massive log in queues until after Early Access started. Over-Population is entirely due to all of those returning players, who had every right to expect their characters from 2014, 2015 or 2016 to still be available.
    (2)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »