I think I'd consider that more of a side-effect than a special power. But yes, you're right, I hadn't considered the turn-into-a-dragon thing. I'm guessing that if that's the only takeaway from eating eyes, though, I doubt Thordan and his knights would have been too keen!
I touched on this in my post - while they WERE able to take on Nidhogg, it was thirteen versus one, and they suffered enormous casualties. While Nidhogg was among the toughest of dragons, I think it can be assumed that Thordan's knights were the crème of the crop among Ishgardian Elezen, even before they ate the eyes. I suspect that even unenhanced, the king and his knights would have been a match for Nidhogg.
Even if I were to agree that Nidhogg was simply overwhelming enough that the power of the eyes turned what would have been a slaughter into a pyrrhic victory, enough power to defeat (not even kill!) one dragon while suffering staggering losses does NOT seem like it would be something worth shattering centuries of harmonious coexistence with the dragons. Thordan was clearly expecting something a whole lot more substantial when he slew Ratatoskr. He expected to be able to get away with his crime, that none would be a match for him and his knights - and the power he obtained, if any, was far short of that.
It's certainly possible that Thordan was simply mistaken. Perhaps consuming the eyes of a dragon transfers only a fraction of that dragon's power (in the MSQ, best results from using eyes seems to be wielding them whole and uneaten). Perhaps the whole idea was nonsense to begin with; Thordan, delusional with envy, latched onto an unsubstantiated rumor, and got nothing out of the bargain except a curse for the few of his men to survive (the blood-drinking transformation). It's undeniable that whatever he was hoping for, he expected it to be enough to weather the dragons' retaliation, and it clearly was not.



Reply With Quote



