Please make Top 30 Feast mount obtainable through other means.

[Titor]

I mean, I'm assuming that everyone here who wants the mount to remain exclusive would be in favor of actual policing of Feast ranked solo and LP, then?

This is pretty much what many of the legit pvpers want right now. Some of them have even gone so far as to sacrifice their forum account by calling out the traders by name (and subsequently getting a form ban) just in hopes of getting noticed by the mods.
Yes we want policing.
Yes we want cheaters and hackers dealt with.
No we don't want our rewards given away to whoever

[Magic-Mal]

.

Except raid mounts for the first 6 months of release are available to everyone who is dedicated enough to get the mounts. PvP mounts aren't available to all the people who have the dedication. 100 ranked leaderboards? No matter how dedicated I am, someone with more time than me will just win. Is that fair? Realistically, can someone who only has 3hrs to PvP a day beat someone who has 18hrs?

[Exira]

Except raid mounts for the first 6 months of release are available to everyone who is dedicated enough to get the mounts. PvP mounts aren't available to all the people who have the dedication. 100 ranked leaderboards? No matter how dedicated I am, someone with more time than me will just win. Is that fair? Realistically, can someone who only has 3hrs to PvP a day beat someone who has 18hrs?

Yes. A guy needed 7 days only in chaos to get from rank 0 to top 6 solo q. He transfered the day when blind week started other ppl had 3 months.

[Titor]

Except raid mounts for the first 6 months of release are available to everyone who is dedicated enough to get the mounts. PvP mounts aren't available to all the people who have the dedication. 100 ranked leaderboards? No matter how dedicated I am, someone with more time than me will just win. Is that fair? Realistically, can someone who only has 3hrs to PvP a day beat someone who has 18hrs?

The person on aether who had the fewest matches and made top 100 had 139 matches. 139*10 min/match is only about 24 hours total. Factoring in queue times and even bumping it up to 20 minutes per match, that's about 48 hours. The season lasted about 4 months. This would be approximately 40 minutes a day. You have 360 hours in a season if you play everyday for 3 hours a day. This is plenty of time to get on the leaderboard.

[Magic-Mal]

The person on aether who had the fewest matches and made top 100 had 139 matches. 139*10 min/match is only about 24 hours total. Factoring in queue times and even bumping it up to 20 minutes per match, that's about 48 hours. The season lasted about 4 months. This would be approximately 40 minutes a day. You have 360 hours in a season if you play everyday for 3 hours a day. This is plenty of time to get on the leaderboard.

139 wins to top 100.. seriously? That would require sheer luck to never lose a single match or cheating. Is that really dedication?

[Titor]

139 wins to top 100.. seriously? That would require sheer luck to never lose a single match or cheating. Is that really dedication?

No, it's just being good. However, if one would take more matches, say, even 400, that's still about 130 hours, which is well under the 360 hours you have in the season playing 3 hours a day?

[ThirdChild_ZKI]

Except raid mounts for the first 6 months of release are available to everyone who is dedicated enough to get the mounts. PvP mounts aren't available to all the people who have the dedication. 100 ranked leaderboards? No matter how dedicated I am, someone with more time than me will just win. Is that fair? Realistically, can someone who only has 3hrs to PvP a day beat someone who has 18hrs?

Likewise, can someone who only watched a video go in and clear these raids right away?

Everything in this game takes time, skill, effort, or any combination of the three. Most PvE content really only requires effort or time. PvP does indeed require all three. And with a preseason going on right now - something we haven't gotten since the Feast began - this is a perfect time to make efforts to raise your skills. I myself have the skill, and I made the efforts, but largely lacked the time to place top 100 myself. I'm not bothered by that (RL comes first, of course), but let it be said that I do sympathize to a degree.

All in all, rather than wanting Season 3's rewards in a to-go box, there's a new Feast season coming in a month, and plenty of room at the table. Fight and grab a seat if you're hungry.

[Exira]

139 wins to top 100.. seriously? That would require sheer luck to never lose a single match or cheating. Is that really dedication?

A guy on chaos 141 games 101 win as pld.

[Shippuu]

If I offered you a huge sum of money to climb a mountain and you did, how would you feel if I turned right around and offered the same reward to someone who walked the trail to the top right behind you? That's what this is about. People's keyboards/controllers are still warm to the touch from Season 3 and people are clawing at the rewards from it already. . .

Why would you care, you still got the money.

Making the rewards accessible by another means later doesn't invalidate the achievement and reward you got. You still got the reward. It's like raiders who get their gear, but then 6 months, or a year later when the fight is much easier due to better gear, more people can get it.

Absolutely the same should be done for PvP rewards such as the mounts. It doesn't have to be now but it should absolutely be done some time in the future. They already cracked and did this with the minions which were an even higher ranking PvP achievement than the mounts.

[KusoWat]

I love how everyone here who advocates for free mounts are also people I've literally never seen in pvp in my life.

You guys don't even have the Gloria mount (from 200 wins, not exclusive.) why are you complaining about there being a reward for content you'll never do?