Stop asking SE to give top 100 stuff to everyone. What a nuisance.
Better?
I don't know, the OP was talking about the stuff from Top 30, I didn't thought a clarification was needed, but there you go.
Last edited by Leanna; 03-03-2017 at 04:40 AM.
I don't think SE needs to *give* us anything. I think we need to earn it. I'm ok with earning the top 30 feast mount through other feast methods, simply because of how PVP currently is now. Win-trading, botting/teleport hacks and the like is a real problem. It's not even really based on your skill in pvp.
Sure, there are many skilled players, but also many who, by sheer luck, happened to be on teams that won consecutively. Even Savage doesn't have that kind of RNG - since you can still trade in pages for items over time. Imagine if you got a random group in Alex Savage which determined whether or not you could earn a reward from beating it - could you *imagine* the vitriol?!
Last edited by Yukumazi; 03-03-2017 at 05:47 AM.
No.
Double no for the people the that would take away the exclusivity of this mount but still scream that legacy mounts should be exclusive forever.
Tbqh I thought I will be in 70s because everyone was telling 1950 score is safe so I stopped after 2k to be sure. I wouldn't complain if I lost my spot in Top 100, it would be only my fault. But Top 30 premade is entirelly different story. Countless hours of waiting just to see constant withdrawals from wintraders testing ques, what kind of 'PvP' is this?
Last edited by SuperZay; 03-03-2017 at 05:49 AM.
I beat the cheaters and so could you.
I don't really like the mount, so I don't care for myself, but if people want it, I hope it's added eventually.
The assets are already made, so it's not like it'll take away from other content. It might be more politic to wait a few months to give the snowflakes time to enjoy their 'exclusively', though.
So then, going by that logic, world first/server first raiders and people who are skilled enough to clear content right away are "snowflakes" who just want everything exclusive to them, right? It's got nothing to do with rewards proportional to the effort they put in? It's got nothing to do with personal drive or willingness to take on a challenge, right? It's just wanting to be special?
I'm sorry but calling people who compete for something and win it "snowflakes" when they simply don't want to feel their efforts were unnecessary is wrong, and I can't ignore that.
If I offered you a huge sum of money to climb a mountain and you did, how would you feel if I turned right around and offered the same reward to someone who walked the trail to the top right behind you? That's what this is about. People's keyboards/controllers are still warm to the touch from Season 3 and people are clawing at the rewards from it already. . .
Does anyone remember when you could get EVERYTHING but Atma from hunts? Remember what it did to instance queues? THAT is how you kill a game. Make everything easy to get, and people will stop trying. They'll stop playing.
If you want a hellhound mount, Season 4 starts in a month. Get in the fight.
Last edited by ThirdChild_ZKI; 03-03-2017 at 06:51 AM.
Player
I mean, I'm assuming that everyone here who wants the mount to remain exclusive would be in favor of actual policing of Feast ranked solo and LP, then? I feel like this should be the highlight of the thread, rather than a silly red hellhound mount. There have been cheaters and win-traders that have ranked in pretty much every Feast season, IIRC, and to my knowledge nothing has been done about them. Even though I don't do ranked Feast, it's still pretty disheartening to see. Why bother taking the time to develop all these new maps and modes if there's no guarantor of competitive integrity for any of them?
You know, the dust still hasn't settled from the minion thing as well. . . The issue isn't that the minion was made available to everyone who didn't compete. The issue is that the "extra" reward given to top 10 was not proportional at all. Earrings? I got earrings just for participating in Season 2. That's a slap in the face for the top 10 of Season 3.
As for cheaters placing top 100, the responsibility of dealing with that lies solely on SE, who to this point have done quite little to assist in mitigating cheaters. Players have submitted report after report, submitted screenshots and evidence that was deemed invalid, and have even taken to trying to hinder attempts to cheat personally with little success. Trying to say people deserve a competition award that others cheated for is even further slight to the people that competed fairly for it. It's like saying "I didn't participate, but at least I didn't cheat, so I deserve it."
No. You don't.
Edit: The post I was responding to was deleted. My statement however still stands.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.