Dear SE, NOBODY asked for under wear changes, just race unlocking Hempen sets.

[Fawkes]

The "ID 0" answer was an excellent answer to anyone who understands how the equipment is programmed into the game. It would be difficult to implement, precisely because the player's skin is a part of the gear model.

That's not at all what the answer he gave was. He said ID 0 cannot be changed, and a way around that would be to create new ID 1 gear that looks like the ID 0. You're adding a lot of your own answer to his to try and make it make sense. How do you explain the "underwear underneath your underwear" part of his answer if you think he's saying ID 0 is just the skin model part of the gear?

[Clethoria]

I'm asking for it. There. Can't speak for the entire playerbase now.

[Xaeth]

That's not at all what the answer he gave was. He said ID 0 cannot be changed, and a way around that would be to create new ID 1 gear that looks like the ID 0. You're adding a lot of your own answer to his to try and make it make sense. How do you explain the "underwear underneath your underwear" part of his answer if you think he's saying ID 0 is just the skin model part of the gear?

Ok, I'm not sure if this is what's confusing you but I'll try to make things a bit clearer.

ID0 is the skin texture. Currently hempen sets are ID0 which means they only change the texture of the skin to look like you're wearing it. If hempen sets where made to be ID1, you would still have your standard ID0, which is what you see when you don't have anything equipped, beneath the ID1. Since our naked body has underwear which are clearly visible when you just unequip everything, you would then have underwear(hempen sets on ID1) on top of that underwear(naked body on ID0).


I hope that clears up some things.

[Canadane]

70+ people disagree.

I don't think you understood my post.

[Fawkes]

ID0 is the skin texture. Currently hempen sets are ID0 which means they only change the texture of the skin to look like you're wearing it.

No, this is wrong. Especially for Aura and Lala hempen sets, they are clearly not just a texture on the skin. They are all regular gear models like every other piece of gear.

If hempen sets where made to be ID1, you would still have your standard ID0, which is what you see when you don't have anything equipped, beneath the ID1. Since our naked body has underwear which are clearly visible when you just unequip everything, you would then have underwear(hempen sets on ID1) on top of that underwear(naked body on ID0).

Each piece of gear that shows skin has it's own skin model. So when you equip a swimsuit for example, it doesn't use the "naked" model underneath, otherwise you would see the tighty-whiteys in the spots where it reveals more than they do. (Or, you would see a hole). The hempen gear already exists as ID1. So when Yoshi talks about how if they did this you'd have underwear over your underwear, and he means ID1 is the hempen gear and ID0 is the naked character, that's already how it works. It makes it seem more as if he thinks the hempen gear is the tighty-whiteys.

[Belhi]

Considering hempen sets can be glamour onto other armour I don't see how this is a particularly technically difficult problem. I suspect he just misunderstood the question. After all if ID0 couldn't be changed then how would putting a Hempen shirt in the Chest slot (ID1) change the appearance on the character?

[Bluejay]

Well there was at least one thread (maybe couple more) that was titled something like "i want to wear other peoples underwear" that was really about the hempen set, so I could see where the confusion came from.

Yeah in their defense I wouldn't read a thread with that title either.

[FoxyAreku]

I asked for the awful looking underwear and weird sandals on bare feet to be changed, actually. I guess I'm nobody.

[Niwashi]

Listening to someone doesn't mean you have to carry it out. Something people forget.

No, this thread has nothing to do with whether they carry out the suggestion or not. It's about the fact that when answering the question, it was clear Yoshi didn't know what the question was about. There's another thread for arguing over whether providing this gear for all races would be good or bad. This thread is simply about what gear it was that was being requested and why Yoshi didn't understand the question.

This was not the onliest question Yoshida was off topic.

There was also the question, why regular instances and ex primals are getting more and more easy. Yoshida was just talking about the raid. But this was noit the question.

Your post is irrelevant to the thread, obvious troll is obvious.

This thread is about Yoshi's answer not matching a question that was asked. Pointing out that he did it in more than just this one case is certainly more relevant than all the posts here talking about whether people do or don't like the suggestion. (Or did you forget there what this thread is about. You might want to check that before accusing other people of being off-topic.)

No they just listen more to the Japanese gamers more since Japan is there home country its the main reason why the dev team reply to their threads.

But in this case, it's not about which question they address, it's about answering a question without understanding what the question is.

The hempen set is /classified/ as underwear. That's what he was talking about having to switch the slots. When you wear the hempen set in 1.0 it changed what your underwear looked like and that has not changed. When you wear the hempen set it looks like it takes a slot but essentially just changes what your underwear looks like.

No. That's how it used to work in a different game. We aren't playing 1.0 any more, and it's not 1.0's former mechanics that were the topic of that question and answer session. In the game that currently exists, the Hempen sets are simply gear that take the same body and legs slots as any other body and legs gear does. The extra slots that used to change the appearance of your underwear no longer exist, so there would be no reason to have questions about them.

Where does it say that SE will cater to every cry of the people...

They don't need to cater to every request, but it's aggravating when they don't even understand what those requests are. If they understand the request and decide it's not worth the time/effort, that would be a completely different matter. But when their answers don't pertain to the questions they're given in answer to (whether it's racial unlocking of hempen sets, or difficulty of dungeons and trials, or any other question), that leaves people feeling they're not being heard, even on the one occasion that exists for the sake of dialog between us and the devs.

[Automedius]

80+ people agree....there's no way square Enix hasn't noticed this yet.