thank you and suggestions

[TiramisuMacaron]

Don't worry, the GMs tell us they will investigate throwers and wintraders all the time.... They never do.

[Chevronone]

Requiring a set minimum of weekly matches is a horrible idea, especially since at higher ranks the queues are literally dependent upon the two same healers playing. When one decides to stop for the night, Feast 4v4 comes to halt.

Regardless, some of the top players sit at well over 800+ matches at this very moment. Are you telling me if they decide to go on vacation for just a week they are reset hundreds of points? That's silly.

[RED-WIND]

It's not silly there are a bunch of healers in silver and gold tier that could make there way to plat and diamond and more would start healing if there was no one to do it what it would force is people to actualy play not reach a point and stop to keep there spot that again slows q times you would have to actualy try to play to keep your spot making those that did end up in top 100 truly deserving of it rather then a group of people trading wins and people who know they are stalemating the rest of the people by not playing

[RED-WIND]

Removing the top 100 prize would go bad for pvp we got the boost in players because of the mounts and it gave people a reason to have more interest in playing pvp take it away and the numbers will decline again and so will the qs

[Arisato]

Removing the top 100 prize would go bad for pvp we got the boost in players because of the mounts and it gave people a reason to have more interest in playing pvp take it away and the numbers will decline again and so will the qs

Yeah perhaps we got a boost in players for Feast, but that's in the lower rankings. When you reach gold or even high silver, we face the issue of having small pool of players in these ranks. Not to mention the win traders, which they find the mount enticing as ever. If we want to actually get a somewhat healthy base of players. We need to actually get real incentives to actually climb the ranks, not just be top 100 for the real prize, or get this silly little bracelet you probably won't use for glamour.

Removing the top 100 was a salt suggestion by me. But honestly, you can move that reward to a certain rank like how League of Legends does it. That way players in the lower ranks can get a chance at this new reward. If you still want to make the mount or whatever the future top 100 reward maintain being in the top 100, then just create a better incentive than a bracelet, because most players that try Feast end up quitting because it isn't worth it the time.