Results 1 to 5 of 5

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Zojha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    3,565
    Character
    Lodestone Bait
    World
    Pandaemonium
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 1
    The same argument could then be brought for pretty much any other slot however, for example with T-shirts and the Survival Shirt, bracers and necklaces, wedding rings etc, and it goes a bit further: Being left/right handed or ambidextrous.

    So I don't think an exception for glasses here is warranted. But I do think that in the long run, it would be good to make the glamour system independent of the actual gear you're wearing and instead use a system similar to gear sets, where you can instantly switch between glamours at will. It would alleviate your issue as well, but it would also help everyone else.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    LineageRazor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    3,822
    Character
    Lineage Razor
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Zojha View Post
    The same argument could then be brought for pretty much any other slot however, for example with T-shirts and the Survival Shirt, bracers and necklaces, wedding rings etc, and it goes a bit further: Being left/right handed or ambidextrous.
    Well, glasses ARE a special case in that really, you SHOULD be able to wear glasses ALONG WITH most other headpieces. There's no reason I should have to take off my glasses to wear a hat, or even a helmet.

    I think that it would be nice if SE would create a glamour-only slot for glasses. Unfortunately, there are a lot of glasses in this game that AREN'T glamour-only, and have actual stats on them. Adding this feature might require more rework than SE is comfortable with - and that's disregarding the possible clipping issues. (Though, to be honest, we've got tons of clipping issues with other gear we have, so I don't think SE would need to worry too much about that problem. If folks are silly enough to wear both glasses and a mask, let them.)
    (0)