"At the moment we are working to get rid of the gender lock for bunny suits for men."

[Remus]

It's most likely not a high priority for them right now due to not that many people wanting it but people were vocal(simple fact). They will add it when they are ready to add it. Also If I had to pick out of this or nier glamour... I will pick the nier glamour.

[Vidu]

It's most likely not a high priority for them right now due to not that many people wanting it but people were vocal(simple fact). They will add it when they are ready to add it. Also If I had to pick out of this or nier glamour... I will pick the nier glamour.

How are these two related? One is removing the "female only"-tag on an item (because what people care about most are the ears, the rest would be nice aswell, but they could throw us that bone at least) the other one is creating a whole new model/gear-set/hairstyle/whatever it is that you want. One is a step into equality, the other one is creating more models.
They were VERY quick with removing the male-only tag when female characters complained... took them like one patch or was it even just a hotfix?

As much as I like new stuff - I feel they should clean up the "mess" (probably a to strong word, but english isnt my native language and I cant think of a better one right now, sorry) they've caused. People WERE vocal about it - and vocal enough for them to notice. And as I already said: I dont understand why it is so complicated to give at least the ears to male characters - its not as if the headshapes would be extremly different or anything.
(the only explantion I could think of would be that someone on the team doesnt like the idea - but they should just admit that then, so that the forum can demand to fire them, get a few bans and have closure on this issue - srsly this is a bad joke by now. The model is there, ready to use - why dont they use it? This is nothing they have to get ready... If they dont like it, they would be better off with just admitting it.)

[GMERC]

(the only explantion I could think of would be that someone on the team doesnt like the idea - but they should just admit that then, so that the forum can demand to fire them[...])

Do you have even the slightest amount of respect for a creator's right to want something their way? They don't ever have to do this if they don't want them to, and the fact that you think anyone should actually lose their job over disagreeing with you on idiotic rabbit ears means that you are the problem.

[Vidu]

Do you have even the slightest amount of respect for a creator's right to want something their way? They don't ever have to do this if they don't want them to, and the fact that you think anyone should actually lose their job over disagreeing with you on idiotic rabbit ears means that you are the problem.

I was being sarcastic there, sorry if that wasnt obvious^^'
More refering to how this forum is rather than actually demanding that.

I have a lot of respect for the devs wanting something a certain way - IF they have the guts to step forward and admit that. But telling us for over a year now "We're looking into it!" makes me lose my rspect, I'm really sorry. Even if they came forward now and said "Okay, listen, we thought about this and we dont like the idea" would be totally fine for me. But "Please look forward to us maaaaybe removing a tiny female-only tag one day" feels... well, like a bad joke by now.
I'm the first one to defend their right to make design choices, but I dont like the idea of not keeping a promise (and seeing how removing male-only tags takes them like one patch max, this is getting really close to breaking a promise)

To make it clear: I personally wouldnt ask for anyone to lose their job over this - but I also know how this forum works - tsk, tsk, people are always so quick to jump to conclusions and attack people... classy forum

[Eul]

I have a lot of respect for the devs wanting something a certain way - IF they have the guts to step forward and admit that. But telling us for over a year now "We're looking into it!" makes me lose my rspect, I'm really sorry. Even if they came forward now and said "Okay, listen, we thought about this and we dont like the idea" would be totally fine for me. But "Please look forward to us maaaaybe removing a tiny female-only tag one day" feels... well, like a bad joke by now.
I'm the first one to defend their right to make design choices, but I dont like the idea of not keeping a promise (and seeing how removing male-only tags takes them like one patch max, this is getting really close to breaking a promise)

The way they remove the gender restriction of expeditioner gear that was locked for female only is just some proof that they are too lazy and keep delaying this stuff. IMO adjusting the expeditioner's gloves is much harder than adjusting the bunny ears...

[Nestama]

But telling us for over a year now "We're looking into it!" makes me lose my rspect, I'm really sorry. Even if they came forward now and said "Okay, listen, we thought about this and we dont like the idea" would be totally fine for me. But "Please look forward to us maaaaybe removing a tiny female-only tag one day" feels... well, like a bad joke by now.

One day, the Post-Moogle Cap will be dyable... that was another thing they were 'looking into' around a year (or so?) ago.

The "male bunnysuit" should be a butler suit, not a dress, anyway.

No, it should be a Chippendale.

No. I'm saying it's just as ludicrous to say men can't wear pink because it isn't masculine, as it is to require male players to play only male characters, and female players to only play female characters.

Which is hilarious, as pink was originally considered to be a masculine colour (while blue was feminine).