From patch 3.4 notes:
And I'm not sure I understand OP's post - aren't you get screwed the moment you have a BL proc while your WM is off?Auto-attack will continue to damage targets in melee range regardless of the direction the player is facing.
From patch 3.4 notes:One small change though, which doesn't affect the general math but increases the number of corner cases - you no longer need to be facing the enemy to shoot it with AAs.
This means that, for instance, something like toggling WM while running to outer-edge Optical Sights, is at least plausible (I wouldn't necessarily say optimal) when it would previously been tricky at best to maintain the necessary facing direction while relocating. I think you'd need to be hard-locked into requiring 2+ Feints to consider it though.
And I'm not sure I understand OP's post - aren't you get screwed the moment you have a BL proc while your WM is off?Auto-attack will continue to damage targets in melee range regardless of the direction the player is facing.
From patch 3.4 notes:
And I'm not sure I understand OP's post - aren't you get screwed the moment you have a BL proc while your WM is off?
Okay so I tested this by attacking the dummy in my yard and then turning my back.... AAs were totally going off, but seeing that wording, it occurs to me that I may have been just inside melee range. Will check again later.
EDIT: Nope, works from 20y way. Facing directly away from the dummy, still pewpews. Feel free to test yourself.
Last edited by Cetonis; 02-03-2017 at 09:20 AM.
Ok, yeah, this was the first thread that I openned in the forum (in fact this was my first post) so I'm really sorry for the messy post.
By the way, is there a way to change post title?
Sorry if it's misleading. And yeah, I play the game only since the end of patch 3.4, but I'm so invested in BRD (And MCH too now) so I didn't know this was already tested.
I also admit, the macro itself is poorly thought too.
Actually there are a couple more things that I wanted to discuss. It is regarding buff alignment and optimal Skill Speed.
But I guess, I'll have to do a little bit more research and data collection before posting it to make it fool-proof.
Last edited by chrissun; 02-04-2017 at 12:03 AM.

You aight dude. Just be sure and think out the Title of your post. Maybe just add a "how do I" in front.Ok, yeah, this was the first thread that I openned in the forum (in fact this was my first post) so I'm really sorry for the messy post.
By the way, is there a way to change post title?
Sorry if it's misleading. And yeah, I play the game only since the end of patch 3.4, but I'm so invested in BRD (And MCH too now) so I didn't know this was already tested.
I also admit, the macro itself is poorly thought too.
Actually there are a couple more things that I wanted to discuss. It is regarding buff alignment and optimal Skill Speed.
But I guess, I'll have to do a little bit more research and data collection before posting it to make it fool-proof.![]()


I know stance toggling is a thing with mch but brd?, not sure about this.

OP, you inspired me with your panache.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


