Results 1 to 10 of 16

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Synfrag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    377
    Character
    Syn Kazama
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    Good post but unfortunately I highly doubt you will get any response on it. If they aren't announcing publicly what engine the new version is being developed on they sure aren't going to do it in here.

    We are all praying for DX10/11 but I think they would have mentioned it already if it were happening.

    Best of luck though!
    (1)

  2. #2
    Player
    Elkwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    591
    Character
    Elkwood Davidson
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Synfrag View Post
    Good post but unfortunately I highly doubt you will get any response on it. If they aren't announcing publicly what engine the new version is being developed on they sure aren't going to do it in here.

    We are all praying for DX10/11 but I think they would have mentioned it already if it were happening.

    Best of luck though!
    It would make sense for them to announce Luminous if it is said engine especially since they are touting a 30% reduction in development time using said engine.

    If it is Luminous then it would make sense that DX11 works, that should also fix the AA/AO issues as well and most of the heat issues with the new client.

    I guess from a stockholder view of things I am curious how XIV 1.0 even got the green light using Crystal Tools if it was such a bad engine to begin with. Judging by what this development team is saying the engine is so bad it seems like SE wasted there money developing anything for it aside from FFXIII which was straight to PS3/360.

    Idk as a consumer I guess I just want assurances and technical details that these issues will be resolved using the new engine, or at least some type of technical explanation on how they intend to resolve these issues in the 2.0 brand of product.
    (3)

Tags for this Thread