I totally dig some of your listed suggestions and I'd like to see some of these be implemented in 4.0, like more ways to mitigate and a flash DoT, but some things did bother me a little due to how much they impede on the designs of both WAR and DRK. WAR feels more like the tank with self heals and while I understand DRK can self heal as well, DRK has to pay a lot for its self healing and often it wont be as good as what WAR has. As for the magic block/extra mit, it doesn't really seem fair to DRK for PLD to overtake the identity of another tank for the sake of making it more tanky. Yoshi commented on the status of PLD as the "best defensive tank", which I believe he meant in regards to how well it mitigates physical damage as opposed to how well DRK mitigates magic. With rage of halone, blocking, and a 10% added onto sentinel over shadow wall and vengeance, PLD tanks physical hits the best out of the 3, but I don't think yoshi meant for PLD to be the absolute king of all types of mitigation, because as it stands, it isn't
http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...-Stance-on-Pld
^ Here's my source for what yoshi said in regards to PLD blocking magic and being the most defensive, if anyone cares to take a look.
Not entirely. The mitigation potential on WAR is insane with skills like inner beast and, if you count the thrill of battle + conva combo to be a cooldown, you then have a tank with more than just one way to mitigate damage and also many ways to do it as well. WAR is also the only tank to have unchained, something that is incredibly strong for opening in any fight and maintaining strong threat on the target for any encounter. In fact, I think when you take WARs insane self healing into consideration, its probably the best at actually tanking. What really drives WAR into the OT slot is the lack of MT exclusive abilities like Reprisal or blocking, the only real argument they have to MTing is unchained, which does happen but an unchained opener is usually followed with the PLD/DRK provoking to become the new MT.


Reply With Quote



