Summoner class is based on the monsters. Not the caster. Subset class the Evoker is generally more inclined to channel Summon monsters powers into their being via trances.I'm saying the job "Summoner" has been handled in various ways and there isn't a concrete definition of what it is or should be. Not every game has a Summoner and sometimes the summons are simply a spell that anyone can learn or use.
This thread was started with the suggestion that Summoners should be more focused on pet commands rather than the Summoner's personal abilities. I've seen the argument multiple times that XIV's Summoner should be more pet-focused in order to be more like a traditional Final FANTASY summoner. There's nothing "traditional" about it.
If it were implemented in a way to reflect traditional Summoners, then there would be no pets and the job would just have the ability to summon various primal likenesses for individual attacks.
End of discussion.
Players wanted a Pet class. They failed to deliver. The rest is history.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

