They should not bother with it. Theres MORE important stuff than this Egi nonsense.
They should not bother with it. Theres MORE important stuff than this Egi nonsense.
Like Lords of Verminion? Glad we go that in the Duty Finder before something like a Raid Roulette...
Heck, what would Egi Glamours even come at the cost of? Pretty different skill sets go into making quests and models/animations than go into balancing new events like Palace of the Dead... Do they even need to make the models for Egi Glamours? Carbuncle already exists, as does Ramuh-Egi and various other ones... Animations are the only thing left to really work on, as well as the method of implementing it/quests introducing it... Meanwhile we've got this huge section in 3.4 on screenshot camera controls that I know for a fact I'll never use...
I'm not going to complain about that though, because I know some will get use out of it... Egi Glamours aren't really that different though, and honestly... We've only been promised Carbuncle up to this point, and the only thing he needs are Summon III animations and Enkindle animations... He already has Summon and Summon II animation... It shouldn't be a lot of work, and yet here we are...
Last edited by Nalien; 09-27-2016 at 03:20 AM.
Why are you posting if you feel this way.* Why even be in this thread? You know how many useless things that people wanted and complained for in this game and have received? Quite a bit. Just because you don't feel this is worth your time does not diminish other's value or desire of this system.


I feel like at this point with all the waiting we've done, all Summoners are entitled to a full size Bahamut Prime glamour. FULL SIZE.
I don't care what the developers have to do - make it work. Drop PS3 support if needed.
No. #EgiLivesMatter


I'm pretty much in the same boat here. of course it is nice to have such a system, cause as we see there seems to be quite the demand for it. but tbh it won't change anything. it won't boost the smn job, it probably won't mean more ppl play the job or have any other major impact on a smn's life...
personally i don't even notice garuda in most fights, she could be a flying pig as long as she does what she is supposed to do.
i just don't really get the massive outcry, but i guess ppl have their reasons. and ya verminion and idle cams or group posing fall under the same category of stuff noone really needs but we gonna get them anyway



They should not bother with 1% content most players won't do or care about, putting TT in DF along with LoV, new PotD, ugly slight alterations of exisiting clothing that are called new gear, face roll dungeons, playlist functions on Orchestrion and new furniture, circle arena primal fights, boring new equipment. There's MORE important stuff than this nonsense.



Yup.
Who cares about them, right, why bother making it if such a small group will even bother? Just do story version, or don't, it's all nonsense anyway.
(obviously I'm not serious, and this is all a snarky way of saying that just because someone doesn't care about something you deem "nonsense" doesn't mean it should cease development, and subsequently remove the delight of its supporters when it's finished - who are they, or anybody for that matter, to say what shouldn't be made or anticipated - there's a whole list of things I deem "nonsense" in this game, but I'm not so vindictive as to wish it stopped, or unfair enough to think its fans are wasting resources just because I don't care for it) Oh, and this isn't aimed at you, just in case you thought it was.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote






