MAN BUNNY

[birdy_reene]

I do not get this part. I am probably overreacting, but is he hinting that the male developers do not want to work on the male bunny outfit, so the female staff need to work on it? Otherwise, why mention the gender of the staff at all?

[/B]

mostly just a norm of how they speak/ mention things in specific regions, like while I was in the U.S Navy in Okinawa; and would speak with the contractors that would come on base to preform dutys we outsourced to the local population. They constantly said "male soldiers, female soldiers, gendered the pilots ect ect. seemed odd to me, but its what im gathering from it. On the flip side. It seems normal to me to have females designed female glamours and males making male glamours, its easier for them to get into the heads of what said gender would want or like. But that's just my opinion.

[LineageRazor]

On the flip side. It seems normal to me to have females designed female glamours and males making male glamours, its easier for them to get into the heads of what said gender would want or like. But that's just my opinion.

Outfits like the bunny costume are NOT about what the wearer would want or like, but what folks attracted to the wearer would like to see on that wearer. I don't think that anyone can argue that costumes of that sort are created with comfort and convenience in mind. No, they're created to highlight the wearer's physical gender and sexuality, in a way to titillate observers who are attracted to that gender.

To put it simply: The bunny costume is more about what a man wants to see on a woman, than it is about what a woman would like to wear.

By that logic, it makes plenty of sense that when designing a costume for a man that is meant to appeal to women, get a team of women to design it. Women have a better idea of what appeals to them than men do.