But one thing is made an accurate critic and another thing is just make poorly complain, based only on your own personal taste.I'm going to have to correct you on that.
Because what people decide as "poorly-designed" can also be abstract. There are plenty of people who pointed out flaws in it's construction and if you read through the thread, you'd spot a link that had some very valid points among others that were even posted here. Everyone here is a subscriber and are free to point out inadequacies in the game, whether you actually like it or not.
Otherwise, how do people expect certain improvements to be made?
No?
Plenty of people already made accurate criticisms, their complaints are valid.
The matchmaking system itself is questionable because believe me, I've ran it with all tanks before and especially at the lower levels... it's not fun. Sure it's easy... but it's also slow. The pomanders can provide help by giving a tank a Pomander of Lust or Pomander of Rage but getting one of those is up to chance. The players in the group can do everything right but it'd still be a buzzkill to have it drag on and like like such. So much for strategy and thought there.
So yes. It's pretty accurate.
Edit: It definitely was received better than Verminion, so I can give it that much credit. But... it's far from perfect.
Last edited by Jatoi; 09-17-2016 at 05:58 PM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.