war nerfs(srs bznz pls)

[Reynhart]

But the two quotes you just quoted say the exact same thing ? How can you disagree with one while agreeing with the other one ?

First Brian_ thought I'd like to remove Path's mitigation,

Path fills the same raid utility role that Divine Veil and Reprisal / Delirium does. If you removed Path without also removing DV and Reprisal / Delirium

then Stark pointed out that it was not removal but just focusing on physical raidwide mitigation.

He suggested to give str down (or actually physical dmg dealt down) to path, not to remove it.

Then Brian_ replied

He clearly suggested to remove the damage reduction from Path and give WAR physical mitigation instead.

instead of a simple "That's what I'm saying". So, it seems that he thought that by Physical mitigation, I meant personal physical mitigation.

If that's not that, then this exchange was just useless.

Image

What, so you actually understood what I meant, yet feel you still need to correct what Stark said ?! So you're arguing for the sake of arguing, or what ?

Also, just saying that he can't read while he's bringing actually valid points and arguments is just disrespectful at this point.

I don't deny that he brings some good point, I just feel that he put too much words into other people mouth, then bashing them for what they actually didn't really say. And also that if you didn't do Savage, you automatically have absolutely no understanging of how the game works, which is false and incredibly condescending.