Tattoo on the back for all players?

[Lambadelta]

I thought the reward for subscribing through a dark time in the game was the Developers nixing the subscription fee for the last few months of 1.0, and then making the game awesome with 2.0? The back tattoo seems like a nice nod more than anything else. Personally I'd rather it was made available to all players. I've seen it sort of become a status symbol at times, segregating the community, which isn't a good or healthy thing at all.

Legacy players get a cheaper subscription, keep special items from 1.0 that are no longer obtainable, special legacy chocobo, and characters that survived the 1.0 calamity got branded.

The legacy tattoo should stay that legacy. I also don't see why people fuss about a tattoo that 99% of the time is hidden by clothing, or hair.

[Vexander]

Legacy players get a cheaper subscription, keep special items from 1.0 that are no longer obtainable, special legacy chocobo, and characters that survived the 1.0 calamity got branded.

The legacy tattoo should stay that legacy. I also don't see why people fuss about a tattoo that 99% of the time is hidden by clothing, or hair.

I don't see why they fuss about it either to be honest. Therefore they should make it available. Personally I rather like the idea of an optionally displayed tattoo linked to the Veteran Rewards that grows more detailed the longer the player stays subscribed.

[Istaru]

Legacy players get a cheaper subscription, keep special items from 1.0 that are no longer obtainable, special legacy chocobo, and characters that survived the 1.0 calamity got branded.

The legacy tattoo should stay that legacy. I also don't see why people fuss about a tattoo that 99% of the time is hidden by clothing, or hair.

It should remain for characters that survived the calamity only. The brand applies to all 1.0 characters, it does not require the legacy status that the other rewards require. Only that the character existed in 1.0.