Golden Saucer - And Then There Were Some Quest

[Frizze]

I will freely admit, one thing about this quest bothered me the first time i did it.

It only took me 3 pieces of evidence to figure out who did it. However, in my search i missed one or two of the other clues. Because of this, when i went to make my accusation the correct dialogue choices werent there and i was forced into a bad ending. Always sucks in "mysteries" like this when you're smarter then your character and you fail something because they needed more then you did to reach the right conclusion.

[Beckett]

I will freely admit, one thing about this quest bothered me the first time i did it.

It only took me 3 pieces of evidence to figure out who did it. However, in my search i missed one or two of the other clues. Because of this, when i went to make my accusation the correct dialogue choices werent there and i was forced into a bad ending. Always sucks in "mysteries" like this when you're smarter then your character and you fail something because they needed more then you did to reach the right conclusion.

So much this!

And the fact that you're locked into picking one of the innocent people, even though you know they didn't do it is aggravating as hell. They should have at least given you the option to back out if you didn't have enough evidence.

[Frizze]

So much this!

And the fact that you're locked into picking one of the innocent people, even though you know they didn't do it is aggravating as hell. They should have at least given you the option to back out if you didn't have enough evidence.

Right! Also...

Even though i kinda thought i was still missing some of the evidence, after searching for 5-10 minutes and finding nothing i figured that must have been all of it. It wasnt at all clear to me that the game was going to tell me i had found everything - in fact the warning at the start about this being a quest with less active help totally made me think the opposite.