If tank damage is now based on VIT, why do healers still have Cleric Stance?

[UBERHAXED]

They have released a job (AST) with stances not battle changable so they would have made adjustments to cleric stance if they didn't want players using it while in combat. And don't throw the obvious "but it was an established playstyle and they can't change it" because they saw bard as unacceptable and changed fixed its playstyle in the expansion.

[DPZ2]

They have released a job (AST) with stances not battle changable so they would have made adjustments to cleric stance if they didn't want players using it while in combat. And don't throw the obvious "but it was an established playstyle and they can't change it" because they saw bard as unacceptable and changed fixed its playstyle in the expansion.

Deliberately disable Cleric Stance while in an instance? There will be a great wailing and gnashing of teeth. Followed by some sheepish looks and a determination to figure things out.

Eventually, there will be a new paradigm. And a number of forum threads complaining "SE broke healers" ...

[Moomba33]

They already disabled CS in PVP for balance. I think they would have done it already for PVE if they thought it was a problem.