Well, devs have already explained a lot of things and then did the exact opposite of that anyway. Point is: nothing they ever say is set in stone. (And even if it was, we have miners and goldsmiths to undo it. huehuehue)
Take a closer look at the Duty Finder for starters. Is it all inclusive? Well, sure, anyone can sign up for any duty they have unlocked. Except for certain specific ones the devs decide not to put in there for a few months, for whatever reason. There are no rules whatsoever, no guidelines, no directives. What does it result in? Someone wants to watch cutscenes when they are actually relevant - how dare they waste time, let's kick them. Someone's a bit undergeared for whatever reason - how dare they, let's kick them. Someone uses up a LB on a huge mass of trash mobs in a place like Castrum (where it fills faster than the speed of light, where at least 6 people are ridiculously overgeared anyway, so much so that every mob can be pulled and mowed down in a matter of two minutes) - how dare they, let's kick them. Someone plays in a specific style for whatever reason that is not "the optimal" - how dare they, let's kick them.
Point is: for all its "all-inclusivity", the Duty Finder is already way more than toxic. It's already highly selective, to a point of ridiculousness. And the best part? Nothing ever gets done about it anyway because it's "player disputes" and "playstyle differences" and the devs for some reason won't man up to slap even a minimal amount of rules/regulations to the Duty Finder. When that minimum would make these cases of toxicity go away - or at the very least, much easier to deal with.
So, yeah, I understand why Yoshi wants to have it this way, but it already doesn't work as a reasoning for the job customisation issue. Because what he uses as a reasoning, that specific set-up/aspect of the DF - it's already flawed. And if it's already flawed anyway, I dunno about others, but I for one would rather have the flaws allow some more flavours, at least.
And as another point that's just worth pondering (for us as well as them, imo): is it sure that whatever Yoshi envisions as the best and wants to do is really the best that can be done? Even only in the sense of "least bad"? Take a look back at some of the content (or "content") and some of the features (or "features") that they have added and consider the community feedback for a minute - and remember: "everyone is doing it" does not necessarily mean that everyone loves it too.



Reply With Quote








