Are diadem glamours useless?

[Kallera]

You can't use Diadem as Glamour items because they are already glamoured by themselves.

Imagine you glamoured Royal Vest on your ilvl 190 alexander healer chest piece.

Now you get your esoteric chest piece and you try to glamour it:
-You can't use Alexander Healer chest piece (with Royal Vest glamour) to glamour your esoteric chest piece into Royal Vest. => That's what is happening with Diadem gear
-You can use Royal Vest to glamour your esoteric chest piece.

I think that is ridiculous, and kills a cool feature already existing in wearing the diadem gear.

[Twilite]

Ridiculous yes, and a bit unfair but oh well..

[FoxyAreku]

A few willfully ignorant people here it seems like. A modicum of context would reveal he's specifically talking about the glamor aspect being useless.

Then he needs to learn how to state what he means?

He said the mode was useless other than RNG 210 gear. This statement does not reflect "glamour aspect only". At all.

[kenshinjr]

Then he needs to learn how to state what he means?

He said the mode was useless other than RNG 210 gear. This statement does not reflect "glamour aspect only". At all.

Sorry for any confusion generated on my end. This topic is just about my confusion about the way this unique feature of diadem gear was handled and a misconception I had. I was hoping the topic title would frame my initial question. Maybe I worded it better in my second post. Thanks.

[Malakym]

Then he needs to learn how to state what he means?

He said the mode was useless other than RNG 210 gear. This statement does not reflect "glamour aspect only". At all.

The topic title is "Are Diadem glamors useless". If you're going to claim it is then a stretch to assume he is talking specifically about glamors in his post then... I'm at a loss to comment without coming across as insulting.

[Iromi]

I really want to use the blm pvp on my smn...anyone see that drop yet in diadem?

Not like I'd be able to glamour it on top of something though and I already have an awesome 210 body from diadem pls SE..haha

[Mutemutt]

I'm actually a little glad you can't use them that way. As rare as getting a particular piece you want from that would be, I feel that the current situation gives the content where those looks originally come from (pvp, coil, etc.) more value and more reason for people to run it. And yes, I know that most likely, people will run into diadem gear with glamour they actually like (and don't already have) largely on accident rather than purposefully.

[AzakaTonnerre]

Then he needs to learn how to state what he means?

He said the mode was useless other than RNG 210 gear. This statement does not reflect "glamour aspect only". At all.

"Are diadem glamours useless?" That statement pretty much reflects that.

Maybe you need to learn to read titles before telling someone they need to learn something?

You aren't the type that didn't understand why there was an explanation of the difference between solids and liquids in your Chemistry 101 book are you?

[dank1]

A few willfully ignorant people here it seems like. A modicum of context would reveal he's specifically talking about the glamor aspect being useless.

Why would he even assume it's about glamour? Does possible i210 gear not sound like a good enough incentive??

Just as bad as the scrubby glam fetish kids who are sniping 210s just to exchange for tokens for a mount while theyre still in i180 gear

[FoxyAreku]

The topic title is "Are Diadem glamors useless". If you're going to claim it is then a stretch to assume he is talking specifically about glamors in his post then... I'm at a loss to comment without coming across as insulting.

Then why would he bring up the item level at all if he was only talking about glamours?
It's rather silly of you to not see how that would be misleading haha.

Sorry for any confusion generated on my end. This topic is just about my confusion about the way this unique feature of diadem gear was handled and a misconception I had. I was hoping the topic title would frame my initial question. Maybe I worded it better in my second post. Thanks.

np you're fine. Some people here are just overly sensitive and aggressive.