"But this is my playstyle, I pays my $15" *runs off edge, last boss neverreap*
They walk among us
"But this is my playstyle, I pays my $15" *runs off edge, last boss neverreap*
They walk among us
Foe was probably for the healer, who should have been dpsing for sure if possible with the bards being that bad.Had 2 bards yesterday in nevereap and none of them wanted to use wanderer's minuet. But they sure as hell used foe requiem on every monsters they could see even though we did not have any magical dpsers. I mean, I understand WM isn't their favorite skill right now, but a 50 minutes run in nevereap is never a good thing.
So yeah, I agree with op.
Not playing WM was probably because the bards wanted to "stick it to the man", let SE know they don't like it, by screwing their group over while SE will never even know the situation happened, making their efforts or lack thereof for nothing. Which is a subset of bad because plenty of bards are doing fine with WM. If they don't want to use WM, they should learn to play another job. Continuing to play BRD but refusing to use WM is like a BLM refusing to use any Fire skill, bad bad bad.
Last edited by Adire; 10-27-2015 at 02:28 AM.
On the one hand, i don't agree. On the other...
If I MET an ice mage, or a tank that couldn't hold their aggro, I'd probably just talk to them instead of,ranting on the forums about how individuality is a sham and we must all be and do the same in lockstep.
If i met a bard that did 1000dps, I'd proabably not notice. Sorry brds.
Last edited by Kallera; 10-27-2015 at 03:11 AM.
so now bards that do 1000 dps are as bad as ice mages or tanks that are in dps stance all the time, a fresh 60 bard that maybe is even still learning how the rotation works (WM changes the whole rotation), or maybe he feels so undergeared and useless that keeps using TP or MP song so at least bring something to the table.
Obvious troll is obvious
1000 DPS is pretty damn good for a bard who may be popping on ballad occasionally. That's the goal I strive for and only attention during large groups of crunchy mobs.
Now, a bard doing 500 DPS at 60 clearly never upgraded their gear, and a bard doing 400 isn't even trying.
Meta has nothing to do with being good or not. And before you say anything. I do follow some kind of meta, but not blindly.
This whole thread
![]()
No need to correct him. Well playing bards are truly the bane of the eso running community.1000 DPS is pretty damn good for a bard who may be popping on ballad occasionally. That's the goal I strive for and only attention during large groups of crunchy mobs.
Now, a bard doing 500 DPS at 60 clearly never upgraded their gear, and a bard doing 400 isn't even trying.![]()
I agree and I disagree. I agree that at 60, if you're at the minimum iLV for a dungeon and play well that it's no big deal that you're at minimum iLV. You could be trying to get dungeon gear, it's your first 60, etc. As long as you play decently, most people don't get their panties in a wad. (If they do, they probably have other issues than this game.)WTH undergeared?, so now you going to have the best gear since you hit 60? i mean dont take me wrong i understand your point but take hate in people undergeared that sometimes can be just ridiculous, And told them to uninstall the game?, someone take your cookies or something?
I disagree with every other situation though. I shouldn't go into Haukke Manor story mode on SMN and have more HP than the tank because they don't want to upgrade their armor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.