Hmm worked fine for me most of the times... dunno why so many people have problems with this combination : /Are you referring to Contagion? Otherwise, what Conflag do you mean?
If it's Contagion, it doesn't really work because Garuda will use it before Tri-Disaster's DoTs are fully applied. It will sometimes work if she is preoccupied with another attack and Contagion is delayed, but it's too unreliable.
I think it's the "most of the time" part that has people saying it's bad.
This is easily rectified, though, by just adding a <wait.1> or <wait.2> to the end of the Tri-Disaster bit.
/ac "Tri-Disaster" <t> <wait.2>
/pac "Contagion" <t>
Or something like this. It'll give Tri-Disaster time to settle before Garuda pops Contagion. As long as you aren't spamming multiple macros, it should be fine.
I think it's the "most of the time" part that has people saying it's bad.
This is easily rectified, though, by just adding a <wait.1> or <wait.2> to the end of the Tri-Disaster bit.
/ac "Tri-Disaster" <t> <wait.2>
/pac "Contagion" <t>
Or something like this. It'll give Tri-Disaster time to settle before Garuda pops Contagion. As long as you aren't spamming multiple macros, it should be fine.
(But really you should just be using Ifrit because he's actually a dps increase)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

