Class-Specific Limit Breaks

[Amberyl]

I'd just be happy for a reason to use anything regularly that isn't melee dps lb.

PvP says hi.

[hagare]

PvP says hi.

Regular use of LB3?

[Arashmin]

I think the worst offender now is how bad the LB is in Seal Rock for Healers and Tanks, but awesome for all forms of DPS. I'd really like it if you could 'unlock' an LB type and choose it as you see fit instead of being conformed to what your class is normally good for, especially since in PvP it just throws those notions right out the window.

[FoxyAreku]

It's perfect how it is. The LBs should /never/ have varying effects, because people will just pick out the one that does the most damage or has the 'best' effect and boom, that class is now mandatory in every static and no one else is allowed to limit break.

[Tsuole]

It's perfect how it is. The LBs should /never/ have varying effects, because people will just pick out the one that does the most damage or has the 'best' effect and boom, that class is now mandatory in every static and no one else is allowed to limit break.

"I hate variety, everything should be the same! Because if things we'd have choices, we'd pick the best ones!"

Also point quote:
"that class is now mandatory in every static and no one else is allowed to limit break"

You mean like how right now only DPS are allowed to limit break? You mean mandatory classes like how SE is actually FORCING players to use a formulaic party setup in essentially all content?

[FoxyAreku]

Wow this is terrible advice and statement in general.

"Don't worry, you can see your skill animation on a separate video outside the game because our game is designed for you to never see IN game!"
and
"Don't worry, the skill is NEVER useful so the only way you'll be able to see it is in a context where absolutely nothing matters!"

More so, "You don't raid so you'll probably not see the situation where it is useful come up, may as well try it out somewhere else".

"I hate variety, everything should be the same! Because if things we'd have choices, we'd pick the best ones!"

Also point quote:
"that class is now mandatory in every static and no one else is allowed to limit break"

You mean like how right now only DPS are allowed to limit break? You mean mandatory classes like how SE is actually FORCING players to use a formulaic party setup in essentially all content?

Yes, that's how it works. All the LBs do the same potency for a reason. I love how your confusing logic sees one class being the only person able to limit break is somehow better than every DPS class limit breaking, though.

Also, of course, the 'best case scenario' LB, being melee DPS currently, will always be what people default too. This would not change with this thread's idea, and it would actually be made worse as stated above because it would be simplified to only the class with the 'best' result being allowed.

It's not even a big deal though, as a healer I use my LB and save runs all the time, and there were at least 3 fights in coil where the tank LB could be used. The tank LB could be more useful certainly, but everything else is pretty perfect and shouldn't be tampered with.

You're so overly hostile btw, it's adorable.

[UltimateAoe2]

Yes, that's how it works. All the LBs do the same potency for a reason. I love how your confusing logic sees one class being the only person able to limit break is somehow better than every DPS class limit breaking, though.

LBs do the same potency? O.o....
Melee > Caster > Bard/MCH (in respective order), was the order I thought.


i dunno

[Noxifer]

Melee > Caster > Bard/MCH (in respective order), was the order I thought.

Huh. I was under the impression it was Melee > Ranged > Caster. (Since Ranged is less likely to hit as many enemies as Caster LB -- not that this comes into effect often on bosses/raids, but stiill.)

Then again, I don't really play any DPS classes, so... ^^; I haven't been paying much attention.