Results 1 to 10 of 83

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Colorful's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,408
    Character
    Charlotte Elise
    World
    Kujata
    Main Class
    Ninja Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by loreleidiangelo View Post
    Heaven forfend a poor like me what scraped together 80 million gil between me and my BF buy an L house because someone on the forums arbitrarily decided they're only meant for certain subsets of people.
    Heaven forbid a very casual player scraped together 5 mil after saving from their daily roulettes and the like, and now they can't buy it because someone on the forums arbitrarily decided they're too cheap for rich crafters. It goes both ways.

    Keep prices as they are, they're fine across the board. When inflation gets WoW levels of bad, they we can talk about raising 'em.
    (10)
    Last edited by Colorful; 08-29-2015 at 10:26 PM.

  2. #2
    Player
    loreleidiangelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    1,731
    Character
    Lorelei Diangelo
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Dancer Lv 74
    Quote Originally Posted by Colorful View Post
    Keep prices as they are, they're fine across the board. When inflation gets WoW levels of bad, they we can talk about raising 'em.
    I think 80 million gil is much more difficult to acquire than 5 million. Doesn't main scenario alone throw like a million at you just for doing it? 1/5th of a small...1/80th of a large. Big difference. To put it in perspective, for an FC to buy an L you'd need to ask 16 of your members to essentially forego an S house's worth of gil...is an L even the size of 16 smalls? I doubt it. The current L pricing only really benefits omnicrafters and large FCs with 50+ members who are too poor to afford an S house on an individual level, really.

    tl;dr L houses are priced disproportionately high to their worth; raising those prices would only make it worse. (Ms are probably not really worth their value either, tbh.) It seems my opinion is in the minority, though.
    (3)