[To the Devs] New PvP Content is Needed for 3.1

[JubjubTubs]

Jubs wants the names of the dummies that voted for Slaughter. They need to be pushed off a cliff and never remembered from then forth.

New content... 1v1 dueling in open world and removal of GC from Frontlines is only content they need to add to drum up a bunch of interest, and create a bunch of new PvP adicts. And if SE had a clue... they'd know that people into PvP spend much time lvling new jobs simply solely for PvP. Which means SE makes more money keeping people around for a month or two instead of those people going on break till patch day. But I suppose SE doesn't want more money... as evident by them nearly going bankrupt by repeatedly making bad decisions.

[Brianmj]

Jubs wants the names of the dummies that voted for Slaughter. They need to be pushed off a cliff and never remembered from then fortrh.

That's a bit much don't ya think?

My vote would have been for Secure. I'm indifferent to the RNG aspects of Seize. I just prefer something on smaller scale. Slaughter was absurd; it was too much. Seize, thankfully, takes it down a notch. 72 player is fine, but dealing with 72 people at once is not good, and when I'm sandwiched by Mael and Flames, the situation evokes the most horrible feeling I've ever experienced from a video game. That doesn't happen so often for to quit or complain, but it's something that made me realize why I like Secure.

[Beckett]

That's a bit much don't ya think?

[Cidel]

Jubs wants the names of the dummies that voted for Slaughter. They need to be pushed off a cliff and never remembered from then forth.

Probably BLMs reminiscing of their glory days where they could hide behind their entire alliance and drop Cometeors all day for extended killstreaks.