Will we EVER be able to glamour gear that we cannot wear???

[CosmicKirby]

Snip

You're being deliberately obtuse at this point.

They are asking "why" to try and understand what reasoning, from a game design perspective, there are class/job restrictions on items, and for what reasoning should this stay, and for what reasoning NPCs don't also follow this logic. We ALL understand that it's not currently possible to do this in-game, we are pondering why these restrictions are implemented and why they are inconsistent. We're pointing out, that the "common sense" reasoning, is inconsistent and completely arbitrary, and asserting that it is "common sense" without any supporting evidence isn't an argument at all, it's being contrarian for the sake of itself. A simple, "I don't want it to work that way." would suffice, without implying that anyone who wants it otherwise is somehow lesser than you in your reasoning capability.

Much less you're being rude and dismissive of others desires as "wishes and dreams" and seem arrogantly convinced that it "will never happen."

If you're actually going to leave, please do. You're bringing nothing to the conversation except for a passive aggressive behavior that, at this point, I can only assume is intent on getting a rise out of people.

[Blood-Aki]

Wall of Text.

There is NOTHING to bring to this conversation other then denial. Nor was i being "rude" i simply stated why it can't be done, and i kept getting responses like yours (but less jumping to conclusions) Your assumption is also wrong, It's the same reason why female characters do not have male animations, it's an indentitiy issue. and square wants to keep that.

And i was already "done" with this, but i have to keep correcting mistakes like this. but i'll leave you and all else to this now.

[Nektulos-Tuor]

There is NOTHING to bring to this conversation other then denial. Nor was i being "rude" i simply stated why it can't be done, and i kept getting responses like yours (but less jumping to conclusions) Your assumption is also wrong, It's the same reason why female characters do not have male animations, it's an indentitiy issue. and square wants to keep that.

And i was already "done" with this, but i have to keep correcting mistakes like this. but i'll leave you and all else to this now.

Yeah, so instead of saying what your saying. Saying its valid. Simply say.

"I don't like it. This is my opinion."

Your making it sound like there is an issue with it. When you have argued with nothing. So there is no issue. Your just being a brat. =)

There is no lore issue with it.
There is no story issue with it.
There is no game issue with it, its just locked.
There is no technical issue with it. Since we can obviously "Try on" and then fill in the gaps with regular armor.


So yeah.

I already know you don't like it.

[Lone-wolfe-02]

There is NOTHING to bring to this conversation other then denial. Nor was i being "rude" i simply stated why it can't be done, and i kept getting responses like yours (but less jumping to conclusions) Your assumption is also wrong, It's the same reason why female characters do not have male animations, it's an indentitiy issue. and square wants to keep that.

And i was already "done" with this, but i have to keep correcting mistakes like this. but i'll leave you and all else to this now.

You mad bru?