Might as well delete their accounts too with that logic, takes up SE server space right?It's unreasonable to expect SE to keep spending server resources on a house that for a character that hasn't been logged into for 6+ months. What about if in 5 years time and FFXIV is more popular and then add more housing, do you honestly expect them to keep up a house for potentially hundreds of thousands inactive players (if they ever fix the limited space issue)?
Something's gotta happen, cause man it's been a long time since there's been houses available.
From what we've been told SE saves what's currently going on in the server every few seconds, meaning housing as they're not instanced and not inactive characters, server space for characters (I'd assume anyway) would be a few KBs at most, server stress is a different matter entirely. It if it was a simple as throwing more server space we'd have plenty of housing available. But yes, let's compare two entirely different things to somehow support your point.
Actually no, he doesn't. A player is fine to do anything as long as it does not inhibit the activities of other players, and an inactive player effectively squatting on an unused plot of land prevents other players from using that land. Plenty of other MMOs have real estate housing like this and they all have a decay system that takes property out of the hands of inactive players. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. The players are compensated for the loss and all their belongings go into storage usually but they cannot keep the house.
The fact is housing is a finite resource and thus any player that is not actively using it must be forced to give it up to another player that will use it. There is no other solution short of building an entirely instanced housing system and that is incredibly unlikely at this point.
May I direct your attention to the Housing subforum where this (and I guess every other related idea and opinion) has been discussed to death already...
Accounts are also FINITE, they use space, out there, somewhere, inventory spaces, item IDs, profile settings, etc, etc, etc. So, lets delete all 6 months unplayed accounts.Actually no, he doesn't. A player is fine to do anything as long as it does not inhibit the activities of other players, and an inactive player effectively squatting on an unused plot of land prevents other players from using that land. Plenty of other MMOs have real estate housing like this and they all have a decay system that takes property out of the hands of inactive players. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. The players are compensated for the loss and all their belongings go into storage usually but they cannot keep the house.
The fact is housing is a finite resource and thus any player that is not actively using it must be forced to give it up to another player that will use it. There is no other solution short of building an entirely instanced housing system and that is incredibly unlikely at this point.
NO.
The fact is that SE needs to upgrade servers and learn to code. Hurting players by making them lose their stuff if they become absent is just nonsense, and actually, a very bad overall policy cause it means the end of any chance of said players to return to the game, so, no, that unjustified terribly thought fantasy of you people won`t happen.
All MMORPGs out there can do housing right when we talk about accesibility and being able to support the whole player base potentially. The excuse for SE (and this has become the scapegoat for almost all of this game problems) of the server issues has been used enough. Its time for a real solution, no inverted clone wards. Hurting players to not solve a problem is bad. Even unactive players that could potentially always return.
For example, if i leave, and i know my plot was fred and now someone else is using it, thats it, gg SE, and i would never return to the game. So thankfully, SE is smart enough to see that this is NOT a solution.
I'm in the opposite boat here. If I left the game for 6months - 1+yrs I wouldn't expect SE to hold my house in limbo when other active players could use the plot; that's just asinine in my books and nothing that I would quit the game over.
As opposed to a new player joining and seeing that they'll never have a chance at obtaining a house? But yeah, I do agree with the general idea that SE needs to do something about the system first before implementing this. Instanced housing! I couldn't care less if it opposes Yoshida's original vision and he shouldn't either, it's good for the game.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.