New pvp = RNG master?

[Kyani]

Getting 535 points from nodes is hardly considered "poorly positioned" throughout the entire game, though. It'd be more detailed if they graph it out over the course of an entire match. I've had games where we turned around from a 500 deficit, but only because the winning GC got too complacent and careless with their battle fevers. they ended up losing around 300 points to us, but in the end they still won with an S rank spawning next to a node they had already occupied. Those give way too many points for deaths to cause a enough of a deficit unless they were quite literally feeding you.

Well, if you want a node breakdown, those points come from:

4 B nodes (over 5 waves!), half of 2 different A nodes, and about a third of an S node - that's 320 from spawned nodes, and 214 from captured nodes. That's pretty poor positioning, even if our fighting made up for it.

[RiceisNice]

Well, if you want a node breakdown, those points come from:

4 B nodes (over 5 waves!), half of 2 different A nodes, and about a third of an S node - that's 320 from spawned nodes, and 214 from captured nodes. That's pretty poor positioning, even if our fighting made up for it.

Poor positioning would be more around the 300-400 range imo. 4 nodes were claimed by adders the entire game and the rest didn't change hands. There's a lot more spanners in the work, but that at point the node spawns ended up colliding onto adders so they got sandwiched by obth GC. Flame had a lead and got dwindled down by adder, while maelstrom just sat with an S rank after S rank spawn next to their claims. It snowballed out of control in a matter of minutes, and by the time maelstrom was the target of attention, they were already at 700 and sitting on a fresh S rank node.