SIGN if you Hate PVP GC Restriction & Want Change

[PlumpyMcduff]

New PVP Map (Mode): "Seal Rock (Seize)" is releasing in 3.05... again, GC restricted.

Just please give us a "Random GC" Queue for those who don't care.

Or better yet, for those who do (myself included) who enjoy/prefer their aesthetic/glamour options from their GC but would be locked from playing with their friends who like a different GC's aesthetic/glamour more if choosing to remain.

I really dislike Adder's/Flame's colors & gear options, I love Maelstrom, but my friends hate the pirate theme... let us enjoy PVP together without being forced one way or another.

Also, we really need Daily PVP Roulette's for each map (Wolve's Den/Frontlines/Seize).

We please need your support so SE will please stop slaughtering PVP.


Lore-Argument Excuse is GARBAGE!

If I want to RP as a mole or align myself with a different GC, I should be able!!! I already do participate in each frequently throughout the main story.

Also, my FC has an allegiance with a certain GC which may be different than my own... so I can already technically be participate in multiple GC's at once.

Not only that, story-wise, I'm friendly/have preexisting, strong relationships with all three GC's. I'm THE WARRIOR OF LIGHT.

I should be able to side with whom I please as I already have through the story numerous times over.

[Stupiduglytaru]

End gc restrictions please

Rank 50 immortal flames 50 twin adder 23 mael over 1300 games of long q's, god knows what long of my actual /playtime was just from qing pvp..

Those that are in pvp ls's etc please forward this thread to them the more pages and likes we get could actually make a difference!

Those viewing this threading please throw down a like, if you never pvp'd or you have 0 interest please we need your support

The current system in place works like this,
100 maelstrom
100 flames
5 twin adder

Are currently seeking front line, no game can take place due to lack of twin adders.

205 people q ing and not 1 game can take place! Min of 8 per gc is required

With the gc restriction removed 2 x 72man 2 x 24man matches could be playing right now

[myahele]

Sadly PvP is tied with the plot, so there'll be GC restrictions.

With the events of 3.0 who knows if the new PvP map will be lift that restriction?

I wonder if this was every asked in the previous live letters? I know this has been asked alot of times in the forums

[Odstarva]

Signed! SE please hear our plea! We beg of you!

[Musashidon]

no, your preference of GC is more important than playing with a friend? then obviously playing with them isn't important at all.

[Johaan]

Sadly PvP is tied with the plot, so there'll be GC restrictions.

With the events of 3.0 who knows if the new PvP map will be lift that restriction?

who gives a shit about plot in pvp, rather have shorter queus than a coherent irrelavent storyline.

"lolz we grand companies are bros, but kill each other for a small piece of land because we cant come to an agreement even though garleans and dragons are wrecking shit"

at least have an option to queu as a mercenary for any GC

[Myrhn]

I don't have a pen.

[Risvertasashi]

signed

/10

[Talraen]

I'd be happy with a checkbox when queuing for PvP that indicated you're willing to fight for any GC (mercenary style!).

[PlumpyMcduff]

no, your preference of GC is more important than playing with a friend? then obviously playing with them isn't important at all.

It's not. Though I'd prefer we all be able to be in the GC we wish & be able to play alongside each other that way.

I have left the GC I love to be in one I hate just to play with my friends; I hate that I felt forced/pigeon-holed into that decision in order to ally with my friends in PVP.

Please be careful not to draw such false assumptions.

Also, I wish that pigeon-holing on no one as I was forced to grind back up to r45 from scratch all over again just to play with my friends. It's idiotic.

Not only that, had to grind up GC ranks & do all their quests over & forfeit my ability to use my Maelstrom Glamours & so on so forth.