Can we agree a glamour to hide fist weapons all together would be amazing? Sometimes I just want to punch mobs for putting heavy on me.

Can we agree a glamour to hide fist weapons all together would be amazing? Sometimes I just want to punch mobs for putting heavy on me.

No one is bothered with BLUNT dmg weapons being claws though? How does that make any sense? O__o
Give me the hide weapon glamor and I'm happy. I'm a monk I wanna punch my enemies with my bare fists not with some toy.

Pretty sure most posts in this thread are complaining about just that.
I personally don't care though, I like the cool claws. But I understand why people want blunt fist weapons (or no weapon at all) and it would make logical sense. *shrug*
we actually get a decent fist weapon now
http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodest...m/87ebcc69fd5/

More claws...we should change monk job name to assassin.


As a MNK this also bugs the crap out of me!.
+1
I want to be able to punch monsters with our fists like Tifa from FFVII. Not only will this make it more immersive/lore-friendly. It also feels good to be grinding monsters into nothingness with our bare fists. Nothing like feeling the thrill of the battle with our body and not with some grubby and probably unpractical katar looking fists with handles and whatnot.

I would prefer that they added "Destroyers" from XI, by far the simplest and best looking design for a blunt h2h weapon that fits closely in relation to your hand. As long as they dont put handles on handles to exstend it to the XIV positioning.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote




