Time for some lyrical analysis!
-----------------------------------------
"Children of the land do you hear
Echoes of truths that once rang clear"
This truth is something that has since been distorted (if it "once rang clear," it stands to reason it no longer does so).
"Two souls intertwined
One true love they did find
Bringing land and heavens near"
This truth mentioned above is about a love that could have joined the heavens and earth. Clear implication would be Shiva and a dragon. Though, I think that to join heavens and earth, it would almost have to be an important figure from both. I dunno, maybe I'm reading too much into this part, but I think Shiva's pre-heretic importance comes up again. . .
"But flames that burn full bright, soon fell dark
Memories dimmed by shadowed hearts"
Memories of what? Surely not of the love, because the love winds up broken by treachery from outside in a few lines. If the song is chronological (and I can't think why it wouldn't be), these memories are dimmed before the final plea, which means they must be of an event that predates it long enough for memories to be dimmed. I'll try not to read too much into the line about shadowed hearts and waxing gloom, but it certainly gives me pause. . .
"In the waxing gloom did wane the lover's moon
Watching as their worlds drift apart"
The encroaching darkness drives a wedge between the two's cultures. If I'm reading it right, a central part of this darkness would be the distortion of the past. . .
"One soul's cry
A passion dwelling within
Sacrifice, a final plea to her kin"
Shiva, seeing the darkness for what it is, cries out to her kin not to embrace it. The question is, did she ask them to sacrifice, or did she stake the plea on her own sacrifice? The lyric could be read either way, and either could make sense, and either could fit with the next line. . .
"Yet this bond of hope, by treachery was broke
Scattering her words to the wind"
An initial reading says that the bond is the love between Shiva and the dragon. I still favor that reading, but I have to acknowledge that it could be saying there was a brief turning back by the Ishgardians that was then shattered. I prefer the former reading, but have nothing to rule out the latter. One thing of note is the element of treachery. This isn't just her kin ignoring her cries. Someone close would have had to turn against her for it to be "treachery," I'd say.
Knowing what I do of some of the more. . ."traditional" responses to heresy and apostasy, I very much suspect Shiva would have been put to death, though I have no lines of the game text to point to confirming that. That said, I also wouldn't count putting her to death for heresy as "treachery," even if this is before the war started (I can think of setups where I would call it that, but without more information they don't stand). At this point, it's hard to say what the treachery would have been, but part of the result seems to have been Shiva's death (or at least a severing of ties with the Dravanians, but I assume death).
"Swelling over long,
seas of blood, are a song
And death an afterthought
To those who fight for naught"
Here I think we start getting some double meanings. Specifically, I think the word "song" used here references the dragon's desire for retribution:
As for "those who fight for naught," I suspect it refers to both sides. Many of the dragons would be brought in based only on the betrayal of one, and the Ishgardians who are continuing to fight after so many generations that none of them truly remembers the reason the war started. For the Ishgardians, a holy war means that death (while not preferable) is honorable. For a dragon mourning his love, what would death be but a surcease?Originally Posted by Midgardsormr
"A throne, lying empty
A reign incomplete
Alone, for eternity
A pain, without cease"
At first I was going to split this into two couplets, but I think they're too closely tied. I assume that the empty throne is on the dragon side, simply because I don't see any sort of leadership position that would be empty on the Ishgard side. But, I do think the throne is one Shiva was supposed to occupy, so it could be on either side. That said, the lines "Alone for eternity, a pain without cease" is definitely about the dragon. So the question becomes, how closely tied are these two couplets? Was Shiva meant to take even a symbolic role among the dragons?
Also, the part about "a reign incomplete". . . I'm taking this to be something along the lines of "My reign is incomplete without X," where X could be an achievement or a person. Combined with the other lines, of course, I lean towards it referring to an incompleteness because Shiva is absent. But then, the only person that could claim an eternal reign (pretty much confirmed, at least) would be Midgardsormr and (unconfirmed) maybe his first brood. Which leads back to "Was it Shiva and Nidhogg?"
"Children of the land, answer this
Why must you turn to empty bliss"
This part I'm not sure about. I mean, would anyone describe the Ishgardians' situation over the last thousand years "bliss"? I mean, I admit I'm making the assumption that the singer is still speaking only to Ishgard, but even if not, the rest of Eorzea has been far from blissful.
Perhaps it's a reference to their initial decision to break trust with the dragons? I guess no one would have made the decision to start a war knowing it would last a thousand years? I can only assume they would have thought it would lead to prosperity at some point. Seriously, of all the lines, I think this one is the one giving me the most trouble. >_>
"Tell me why break trust, why turn the past to dust
Seeking solace in the abyss"
This couplet I think summarizes the song overall. Shiva was betrayed, the past was systematically erased (calling back to the opening lines--the truth no longer rings clear), and the Ishgardians seek (unknowingly at this point) to end the whole ordeal with death. Their own or their enemy's, either way is solace.
"Tell me why create, a circle none can break
Why must you let go, the life you were bestowed
This I fear I'll never know
Never know"
The "circle none can break" I believe refers to Ishgard's current state. Probably both to its physical defenses walling it off from the outside world and to its policies of isolation. As for the life they were bestowed, the singer seems to be lamenting the bleak life faced by the Ishgardians. Sure, their forefathers led them to this fate, but it's still sobering to think how much richer their lives could be if they could set aside the war and open their borders.
-----------------------------------------
Thoughts? Opinions? Have I completely misunderstood something? Am I reaching too far into conjecture?


Reply With Quote



