I wonder if SMN new ability called Tri-Bind only binds three targets as the name seems to insinuate. That would be super useful.


I wonder if SMN new ability called Tri-Bind only binds three targets as the name seems to insinuate. That would be super useful.
Tri-Bind is just the current Tri-Disaster. Same spell, just renamed. Tri-Disaster is the new ability that'll apply three dots to your target at once, consuming an Aetherflow stack. Tri-Disaster always had the ability to bind more than three targets, they just had to be in range.


But it is a new ability if its called Tri Bind, isn't it?Tri-Bind is just the current Tri-Disaster. Same spell, just renamed. Tri-Disaster is the new ability that'll apply three dots to your target at once, consuming an Aetherflow stack. Tri-Disaster always had the ability to bind more than three targets, they just had to be in range.
Since the name was the only thing wrong with Tri Disaster that infers that Tri Bind will function in accordance with its new name and bind three targets in order to make it semantically correct.
I'm guessing its going to be super useful!
Last edited by AreeyaJaidee; 05-22-2015 at 10:13 PM.
Living life one day at a time~!
Mending the past with the joys of today!

The skill already binds all targets inside it's AoE. I wish they had shortened the cast time or made a proc like 50% chance of the next tri-bind to crit or to use 0 mp... IMO this skill sucks a lot on PvE and I almost never use it.But it is a new ability if its called Tri Bind, isn't it?
Since the name was the only thing wrong with Tri Disaster that infers that Tri Bind will function in accordance with its new name and bind three targets in order to make it semantically correct.
I'm guessing its going to be super useful!
That would be a nerf if was restricted to binding just three targets.But it is a new ability if its called Tri Bind, isn't it?
Since the name was the only thing wrong with Tri Disaster that infers that Tri Bind will function in accordance with its new name and bind three targets in order to make it semantically correct.
I'm guessing its going to be super useful!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote




