Whm / Scholar - who is better

[Raminax]

Neither are better than the other - they compliment each other perfectly. Like pizza and soda. o_O Hamburgers and fries. Chicken and Teriyaki. Fish and Chips. Bagels and butter......... *hunger* :<

Go get some breakfast.

[Saseal]

Go get some breakfast.

*Stares at granola bar* ..... but.... I have no SCH to go with my granola bar.... ;-;

[Riepah]

SCH needs Stoneskin II.

[rawker]

they do. it's called succor.

[Lyzern]

Yessss! I missed this kinda thread!

Another deluded SCH who thinks they're any good because they has fary 8^)

Talk to me when you have AoE heals.

*popcorn*

[Raminax]

Aight, let's derail the stuffing out of this thread!

I am writing this letter purely in the spirit of uplifting and sharing, as corny and dated as those sentiments may sound in the fast-moving and ever-evolving modern techno-plastic times in which we live. Primarily, I want to share with you my view that there is every indication that there is a vast empirical literature on this subject. What follows is the story of how the Scholar can be so rich in the rhetoric of democracy and yet so poor in its implementation. The Scholar is not interested in what is true and what is false or in what is good and what is evil. In fact, those distinctions have no meaning to it whatsoever. The only thing that has any meaning to the Scholar is militarism. Why? There is widespread agreement in asking that question but there is great disagreement in answering it. You see, it is of vital importance that we bring important information about the Scholar's inficete, ugly belief systems into the limelight. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. That's why I contend that it will not be easy to challenge the soft bigotry of low expectations. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that for the overriding reason that it's trying to get us to acquiesce to a Faustian bargain. In the short term this bargain may help us perform noble deeds. Unfortunately, in the long term it will enable the Scholar to make a mockery of our most fundamentally held beliefs.

When you reflect upon this, you'll realize that the Scholar recently made the astonishing claim that it can override nature. Stripped of all its hyperbole, this statement is really just saying that the Scholar occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to create a new cottage industry around its loathsome form of ableism. Ever since the Scholar decided to toy with our opinions, its consistent, unvarying line has been that wowserism forms the core of any utopian society.

If I didn't sincerely believe that the Scholar's squibs offer us nothing more than the same old snake oil in a shinier bottle, then I wouldn't be writing this letter. I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but that fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. “Thinking” is the key word in the previous sentence. Leaving aside the behavior of other abrasive, obnoxious pedants, the Scholar is squarely in favor of authoritarianism and its propensity to distract people from making a serious analysis of the situation. This is so typical of the Scholar: it condemns bigotry and injustice except when it benefits it personally.

The Scholar exhibits a shocking dearth of empathy. But that's not all: It's not the bogeyman that our children need to worry about. It's the Scholar. Not only is the Scholar more untoward and more blinkered than any envisaged bogeyman or bugbear, but if you study the Scholar's insufferable ballyhoos long enough, you'll come to the inescapable conclusion that a central fault line runs through each of its vituperations. Specifically, the one thing that's central to all of its stiff-necked, gloomy asseverations is a desire to criticize other people's beliefs, fashion sense, and lifestyle. I call this the New Ageism. The old ageism was concerned only with turning the world's most civilized societies into pestholes of death, disease, and horror. Although that was bad enough, the popularity of the Scholar's soliloquies among sententious shysters is a harbinger of wanton things to come. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, “The Naked Aggression of the Scholar”. In it, I chronicle all of the Scholar's credos from the bestial to the refractory and conclude that I am growing weary of the Scholar's repeated claims that black is white and night is day. Here, I invoke the Royal Society's famous motto, Nullius in verba: take no one's word for it. That is, we should rely not on opinions but on objective science and experimentation to determine whether or not there is no real way to undo the consequences of the Scholar's scornful jokes. Now that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true.

It's fine to realize that the Scholar's duplicitous approach, which is based on perceptual distortions, must be confronted by a proactive response, but it's more important to know that there's an important difference between me and the Scholar. Namely, I am willing to die for my cause. The Scholar, in contrast, is willing to kill for its—or, if not to kill, at least to make our lives miserable. So, sorry for being so long-winded in this letter, but discrediting ideas by labeling them as insidious is an old tradition among the Scholar's spin doctors.

[Saseal]

Aight, let's derail the stuffing out of this thread!

just kiddin'

[AmewKitsune]

just kiddin'

Hey, I never knew people made gifs of Miqo'tes using /doze.

( )

[Vid]

Monk > All. There's no contest. I'm sorry but Second Wind is by far the most potent heal in the game right now. WHM & SCH can't even compare.

[Lyzern]

Monk > All. There's no contest. I'm sorry but Second Wind is by far the most potent heal in the game right now. WHM & SCH can't even compare.

I agree, besides, WHMs are so much better than Monks at AoE damage, I don't see why Monks and WHMs don't switch places