Abolish 3 way PVP

[RobinRethiel]

The whole war of the three city states against each other makes no sense. It feels very forced. Would be okay if it is training. But otherwise something like this would kill an alliance.

The whole 1vs1vs1 ist just imbalanced. Even worse in Slaughter than Secure. And guilds can just have groups in 2 of the GCs and coordinate over team speak, as one example.

Let them wintrade 1vs1, who cares. But not 2vs1 with the 1 as involuntary victim.

[Morbid]

The whole war of the three city states against each other makes no sense. It feels very forced. Would be okay if it is training. But otherwise something like this would kill an alliance.

The whole 1vs1vs1 ist just imbalanced. Even worse in Slaughter than Secure. And guilds can just have groups in 2 of the GCs and coordinate over team speak, as one example.

Let them wintrade 1vs1, who cares. But not 2vs1 with the 1 as involuntary victim.

The problem there is not the 3 way faction but players being lame and taking the paths of least resistance.

[Conradus]

The whole 1vs1vs1 ist just imbalanced. Even worse in Slaughter than Secure. And guilds can just have groups in 2 of the GCs and coordinate over team speak, as one example.

Indeed--they did it in Dark Age of Camelot, and look how badly it worked there.

[RobinRethiel]

Indeed--they did it in Dark Age of Camelot, and look how badly it worked there.

Not sure if ment sarcastic, but if yes, you can't compare open world PvP to a battleground. It was a different style. People mention a lot of thing, when they talk about the pro (and contras) od DAoC, but while 3 fractions is one of the plus sides, there are many other points and the composition at the end is what it made good in their eyes, not a single thing on its own.

Big problem in FF PvP is, that slaughter killed every other mode, because people like to "pwn" with their personal LBs.