Are they ever

[KuraiKiserogeru]

Once you have the Lion and the Bear, you don't actually care and see their design faults.

Think theres more ponies running around out there than special mounts.

I don't use mine.

[MrCookTM]

Once you have the Lion and the Bear, you don't actually care and see their design faults.

Think theres more ponies running around out there than special mounts.

I don't use mine.

SE missed the point with the tank mounts anyway, since the content they're rewarded for - ex primals and coil - never had an absence of tanks to begin with. The content where this would have helped, dungeons, low level stuff, where the "adventurer in need" bonus pops for tanks all the time, doesn't really gain anything from these mounts. It only makes people do what I do: spam T4 200 times on each tank job for the mounts, just to switch back to my main job after and go farm something else. It is not an incentive to play one of the tank jobs in content where they are missing.

[Viridiana]

It is not an incentive to play one of the tank jobs in content where they are missing.

Even worse for WHM, which just requires getting to 30 WHM and doing a quest. So, it's progress. . .

As to OP, they already (failingly) did it with WHM. SCH could use one, maybe, but there's absolutely no reason to give it to the DPS. In fact, giving it to the DPS jobs is the exact opposite of productive. You want a unique mount, you fill a role people don't want to fill.