Looking at how far back the date of the OP post is, I'm kinda surprised this thread is still going.
I really don't need to say anything either, as both positives and negatives of both WHM's and SCH's have been clarified by various posters. So I'll just leave with this: (As in, may not post in this thread again. I'm not much for these kind of threads)
Personally, I prefer playing as SCH over WHM, but I have fun as a WHM too. While running as a SCH, I also generally prefer having Eos out over Selene, unless I end up in a party with 2 SCH's, and the other already has Eos out. People playing as WHM's may question why I have Eos out, but people also question having Selene out. I gave up on trying to please everyone and just stick with Eos as my preferred fairy. Besides, some other WHM's I've worked with appreciate the extra heal support, allowing them an easier time of MP management.
As for the silly hate on WHM's I'm seeing here... I don't get it. WHM is just fine IMO. I've played as WHM enough times to see that WHM's easily have their place in party setups, and are roughly equal to SCH's. Both bring something to the table the other can't, and that's why many people prefer having parties of 1 WHM and 1 SCH. (I personally can't help but smile when the other healer I'm working with is of the opposite class of me)
I also agree with others that the WHM skill Shroud of Saints needs to be touched up on a little. Well, that and Benediction, IMO. SoS should at least be buffed to scale with some stat on how much MP is regenerated per tick when in use, or cut down the cooldown period of the skill by some degree.
By the end of the day, both of them are important, and I personally just find it silly that anyone would insist on claiming that either role is inferior to the other.
And with that, imma think I just steer clear from this thread for now.


Reply With Quote






