They should choose winners proportional to entries. Having *just* over 100 entries and then picking almost all of them as winners is unfair for other regions with more entries, as we had a much higher chance of winning regardless of the quality of our entries. There was a completely different standard applied, and it also makes non-winners feel rather crappy. The fact they chose not to do 100 but to also not do it proportionally makes me wonder why they stopped at 96 and couldn't pick just one more... And another 3 on top of that. Were ours really that bad?