Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 31 to 35 of 35
  1. #31
    Player
    Squintina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,054
    Character
    Squintina Nightgard
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Laerad3993 View Post
    I'll also post my photo of the week beforehand, where the GM said it wasn't against the TOS. They switched a week later, this last week, after I imagine more was said within the company.
    ok and? companies are allowed to change their stances after thinking about things further. The most recent is what matters.

    It doesn't change that there is a form of reporting. So whether the person reported via GM, who directed to support, or went to support directly, the result would have been the same.

    On the other hand, your result, since this is the first time you've acknowledged a form of reporting, would have led someone to believe there was none at all.
    (0)

  2. #32
    Player
    Laerad3993's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    472
    Character
    Aisha Clan-clan
    World
    Behemoth
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 60
    Edit: not having my posts misused by other people, so that they misinterpret as endorsement for anything in game. I do not endorse a single thing. Point was made.
    (0)
    Last edited by Laerad3993; 01-09-2015 at 02:50 PM.

  3. #33
    Player
    Squintina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,054
    Character
    Squintina Nightgard
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Laerad3993 View Post
    No stance was changed. Lol. 12/11/14, Bayohne stated it wasn't against the TOS. Then I get this the 27th http://i.imgur.com/qEF4Y0p.png. Still not against the TOS. Note that abuse was also never used in the reply. What they did was effectively cut off people complaining about it in game, to in turn come here, and also be cut off.
    You really need to learn to follow posts... I was referencing the GM reply you mentioned. So, let me retype with the clarification:

    ok and? companies are allowed to change their stances on how GMs react to inquiries after thinking about things further. The most recent is what matters.

    It doesn't change that there is a form of reporting. So whether the person reported via GM, who directed to support, or went to support directly, the result would have been the same.

    On the other hand, your result, since this is the first time you've acknowledged a form of reporting, would have led someone to believe there was none at all.

    And it still doesn't change that if topics continue to arise they might do something about it at some point. Even if it's only frowned upon, but not punishable, as of yet, "reporting" (in whatever form) would allow them to decide if the topics are high enough to reconsider their decision(and by reconsider I don't necessarily mean any particular decision. But at least they might give a real "this is allowed" or "this is not allowed and we'll fix it" announcement instead of the "we don't want this but it's technically not against the rules" statement).

    Also didn't you say you had 2 pictures? where's the second one about reporting to support?
    (0)
    Last edited by Squintina; 01-06-2015 at 12:32 PM.

  4. 01-06-2015 12:25 PM

  5. 01-06-2015 12:40 PM

  6. #34
    Player
    Squintina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,054
    Character
    Squintina Nightgard
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Laerad3993 View Post
    term, arsehurt, a month to two months out over something that ended after 2 weeks, is beyond pathetic and childish.
    Term excused (though the person who insists on replying to prove them wrong over something would be just as guilty of being beyond pathetic and childish).

    I will agree with one thing though.

    Quote Originally Posted by Laerad3993 View Post
    This just is not worth the time and effort
    It really isn't :/ Given how only a % of the population will get married a set number of times, many of whom with free plans, and those who pay have to deal with with finding a person of equal bracelet and reserving a time, the market for this is hardly worth thinking about. Perhaps if the system had been less cumbersome it might have been a bigger issue, but it indeed isn't worth the time and effort when we're mostly arguing over who has correct statements anyway.
    (0)

  7. 01-06-2015 12:49 PM

  8. #35
    Player
    ScarecrowJames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Pumpkin Village Hidden in the Crows
    Posts
    139
    Character
    Raccoon Bandit
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Astrologian Lv 80
    So I can legally buy wedding bands and sell them on the AH *brb*

    This is how I look at it. its not against the TOS. Selling them is not how they intended it to be used(imo thats just common sense). I doubt(opinion) they will ban players ,cause its SE fault for failing to realize they made an error before the item was released(but they may). If the item(or any) continues to be used in a way or even a game function it will be changed.

    Instead of changing the item, wasting their time when it can be better spent(my opinion) elsewhere they prefer if players stop selling them if not they will be forced to change the item.

    Selling them is wrong.
    Its not illegal game action in the eyes of the TOS but selling it is not how it was intended to be used. If you are against it say so, report it, if your not against an item being used because "its not my fault the devs screwed up" well I'm not gonna tell you do it but what ever.
    (0)
    Last edited by ScarecrowJames; 01-11-2015 at 06:10 AM. Reason: Opinion

  9. 01-09-2015 01:59 PM

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4