Quote Originally Posted by Giantbane View Post
This was not a strike that he earned on his own. This was given to him by being in a partial party where someone else is entirely responsible. It's unreasonable. It's unnecessary. And the only purpose it serves is to create animosity and distrust between players.
So what you're saying is, based on this:

The party withdrawing gave him THREE. STRIKES. AT. ONCE.? You do realize...he had to have previous strikes on his own for one more to basically lock him out, right? So the way you're arguing is that the party withdrawing that one time gave him ALL OF THE STRIKES NEEDED TO GET A TEMP LOCKOUT.

It doesn't work that way and people against this really seem to be forgetting details. It's one of two things:

1. The person got penalized as they should.
2. There's a bug that they choose not to report.

Which is it?