Dark Knight

[Lord_Zlatan]

10/10 full agreement.
I feel this is a bad mistake that is going to see my favorite class get hugely underutilized. I'm sure it will see a lot of initial use but I don't see it being a dodge or Perry tank, and as we already have a block and a sheer HP tank and more would be redundant. I can't see it working out as those are the only 4 tanks I see thrive in most games. But who knows I may be wrong. Just can't help feeling really let down by this

I have a strange feeling that DRK is going to use the reverse spell (healing magic hurts you, damage heals you) where they sacrifice their HP to build attack power and enmity then lose the Reverse effect to deal less damage, gain less threat, but also actually get healed. Could add a level of complexity unheard of up till now in this game.

[Ehayte]

(healing magic hurts you, damage heals you)

uhhh. wat.

[graudon]

I have a strange feeling that DRK is going to use the reverse spell (healing magic hurts you, damage heals you) where they sacrifice their HP to build attack power and enmity then lose the Reverse effect to deal less damage, gain less threat, but also actually get healed. Could add a level of complexity unheard of up till now in this game.

it can be stance tank also as u said 1 stance for dmging it self while generating emity and 1 stance for dmging enemy while getting heal all can work as similar as life steal attack but no idea about aoe emity generate

[Harrk]

I have a strange feeling that DRK is going to use the reverse spell (healing magic hurts you, damage heals you) where they sacrifice their HP to build attack power and enmity then lose the Reverse effect to deal less damage, gain less threat, but also actually get healed. Could add a level of complexity unheard of up till now in this game.

Am I the only one who is misreading DRK as DPRK? ; ;