Hope to god I never get in a group with the likes of you.Its likely B. You served your purpose, and they saw no more need for you, because you were after the same thing they were. Its hard putting our faith in RNG-sus sometimes, so sometimes we choose the latter, which is kick the odd man out, to make life easier on us. Its selfish, yes, but if you had the chance, you'd take it.

Sounds like a direct admission of guilt of harassment by abusing the vote kick system to me. Mods?Its likely B. You served your purpose, and they saw no more need for you, because you were after the same thing they were. Its hard putting our faith in RNG-sus sometimes, so sometimes we choose the latter, which is kick the odd man out, to make life easier on us. Its selfish, yes, but if you had the chance, you'd take it.
Last edited by Zophar; 09-23-2014 at 07:51 AM.
I'd also like to think that most people would, in fact, not be a group of selfish d-bags and pull a stunt like this.Its likely B. You served your purpose, and they saw no more need for you, because you were after the same thing they were. Its hard putting our faith in RNG-sus sometimes, so sometimes we choose the latter, which is kick the odd man out, to make life easier on us. Its selfish, yes, but if you had the chance, you'd take it.
Sounds like a group of children who are pissed that someone else is playing with their toys.

i love how every single one of you are assuming he does this. he simply made an assessment based off information given. just because you can think, "this guy got mad so he shot his wife" doesnt mean that the person who made that deduction will do the same thing. stop trying to find stupid crap to fight about.
and hes probably right, either they wanted to try to let their friend in for a quick st loot, or they didnt want you rolling on what they were trying to get.
just because he makes an honest assessment of a situation, doesnt mean he is doing those things.
Reading is fundamental.i love how every single one of you are assuming he does this. he simply made an assessment based off information given. just because you can think, "this guy got mad so he shot his wife" doesnt mean that the person who made that deduction will do the same thing. stop trying to find stupid crap to fight about.
and hes probably right, either they wanted to try to let their friend in for a quick st loot, or they didnt want you rolling on what they were trying to get.
just because he makes an honest assessment of a situation, doesnt mean he is doing those things.
Count the number of times he says "we" or "us" in his reply and I think it's safe to assume he's no stranger to this type of behavior.

also note that he says "they", meaning other people, and it still doiesnt justify the kind of comments it generated. when i try to figureout somebody's motives, i do sometimes speak as if im part of the group, just to get abetter feel of what it might actually be, and im not trying to defend him, but trying to defend a method. it is incredibly easy to place myself in a group and see what could possibly cause someone to do something, and i will speak as if im part of that group just because it makes it seem a little more real and allows me to get better insight. there is nothing wrong with just saying it, and someone shouldnt be spoken to like that because of it.
i do acknowledge the fact that it is completely possible that he does do stuff like that, but i wont accept it without some kind of proof or confession, because i would feel that it is wrong.
Fine. Let's try this then. I do not want to associate with someone who tries to justify this type of behavior.
My account. My 15 bucks a month. My choice who I associate with.
Which, by the way, is the point of my original reply.
Rude!!!!!!!!!

Yeah. You're right. He does say they. When specifically referring to the people who kicked the op. But as soon as he's done talking about them, he starts with the we and us, where if he was speaking just on the general level, it would have been much more appropriate to stick with "they." Circumstantial evidence, yes. But fairly compelling from my viewpoint.also note that he says "they", meaning other people, and it still doiesnt justify the kind of comments it generated. when i try to figureout somebody's motives, i do sometimes speak as if im part of the group, just to get abetter feel of what it might actually be, and im not trying to defend him, but trying to defend a method.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote


