Quote Originally Posted by Cichy View Post
You're making this into some kind of Blizzard/9-11 conspiracy. The review was fairly written. The author reviewed the game for what it is. Not what it can be. Not for what the company tried to do. Not for what SE done in the past. He looked at the game objectively and based it on his experience now.
What people dont like is that it was reviewed before a potentionally game changing patch, the only logical reason is because they want the game to fail, give me another reason why it gets reviewed just before the biggest patch released?