If no one access a FC house in 35 Days you lose everything! Coming Patch 2.3 ><

[Nicobo]

I think you need to read what YoshiP said that ARR will not ask players keep their subscription for the FC house upon housing implmentation. ^^;
If there is space for personal houses, why no space for new wards?

Anyway, by the same reason, eventually everyone will lost their personal house if they have not logged in for 35days.
Right?

[Cuervo78]

I think you need to read what YoshiP said that ARR will not ask players keep their subscription for the FC house upon housing implmentation. ^^;
If there is space for personal houses, why no space for new wards?

Anyway, by the same reason, eventually everyone will lost their personal house if they have not logged in for 35days.
Right?

Don't make things up, the 35 day limit is ONLY for FC housing (and indirectly the personal room) so far it was never mentioned for personal housing.

[Nicobo]

unless personal housing is something like moggle houses, otherwise why someone will think it will not be ruled by the 35days restriction when many players need space? ^^;

[chocomaid]

Don't make things up, the 35 day limit is ONLY for FC housing (and indirectly the personal room) so far it was never mentioned for personal housing.

It is a precedent to it. Unless personal housing becomes a personalized instance like your inn room they will be on a live ward. The reasoning for the deletion argued by SE and some players is solely,inactivity and wasted server space, they don't want a ward/a neighbor who is inactive. Thus, it is highly likely that this notion will apply to Personal Housing too. Personal housing at this rate is gonna be similar to FC housing but to a smaller scale, wouldn't inactivity be a problem for them too?

[Aylis]

Why not?

We are still subbed to the game, for now at least. But the matter remains. We worked for it and should we lose it we receive no compensation? Um I guess if SE likes angering possible returning customers. It would be like spending $35k on a new car and having the dealer show up to your house and say "whoops! we see you haven't driven it in a month! So were just going to take it back and give it to someone else that can driver and when you wish to drive again you can pay another $35k!" Um no sorry, massive deal breaker.

Why not? Why not just add more housing instances?

[Elven]

Does FC master switch exactly on the 35th day or does it lapse on 36?

[Ghetto_Ganker]

I was wondering something and if it was answered already Im sorry but im wont be reading 51 pages.

Question i want to know is that they mean by if noone visits the house the fc loses it, What i wonder is if this applies like watering a garden where ANYONE could visit if you set the permissions?

That may make this idea SE has ok to deal with. I know myself, i enjoy visiting other fc houses

[Astralos]

If not one single person from a FC can get to their house for over a month, they don't need the house. That's called being greedy and entitled.

I wouldn't call that greedy or entitled at all, and nobody NEEDS an FC house. What's greedy and entitled are the FCs who are using alts to buy multiple houses for the same "main" FC. Squenix should free up all the plots and houses from those FCs ("main" and "sub") and harshly penalize future occurrences of such behavior.

[SDaemon]

Does FC master switch exactly on the 35th day or does it lapse on 36?

Exactly 35 days. I recently received ownership of my FC because of it.

I think you need to read what YoshiP said that ARR will not ask players keep their subscription for the FC house upon housing implmentation. ^^;
If there is space for personal houses, why no space for new wards?

Anyway, by the same reason, eventually everyone will lost their personal house if they have not logged in for 35days.
Right?

That depends on how they implement personal housing, though I won't argue that it isn't a possibility. One distinction between the two however is that there are multiple members of an FC while personal housing is all yours. There should never be a point where every single member of an FC has been offline for more than 35 days, if so that FC is effectively dead and the likelihood of anyone coming back slim.

[Ashkendor]

We are still subbed to the game

Great! If you're all still subbed, then you'll have no problems getting one person to log in from time to time to do something as simple as entering your FC house in order to keep yourselves from losing it.

Why not? Why not just add more housing instances?

Why add more instances and spread everyone out (furthering the 'ghost town' feel that some have cited)?

Why take up more server resources with unused space?

What's greedy and entitled are the FCs who are using alts to buy multiple houses for the same "main" FC. Squenix should free up all the plots and houses from those FCs ("main" and "sub") and harshly penalize future occurrences of such behavior.

I agree on this one. I really really dislike seeing this.